2020
DOI: 10.33711/yyuefd.800917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratuvar öz yeterlik ölçeği geliştirme çalışması

Abstract: Laboratuvar öz yeterlik ölçeği geliştirme çalışması Adem AKKUS * Öz: Laboratuvar Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği (LÖYÖ) taslak olarak likert tipli 15 maddeden oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın örneklemini sınıf öğretmenliği ve fen bilgisi öğretmenliği programında okuyan 248 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi için orthogonal döndürme (varimax) tekniği ve principal axis factoring yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Faktör eigen değerleri paralel analiz ile kontrol edilmiş ve faktör sayılarına karar verilmiştir. Ölçeğin amacı… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the literature is examined, in terms of measuring self-efficacy in the field of science, a number of examples can be found, such as a science teaching self-efficacy belief scale, an environmental education self-efficacy scale (Özlü et al, 2013), a selfefficacy scale for laboratory practices in science teaching (Aka, 2016), a self-efficacy belief scale related to knowledge and instruction of the nature of science (Tatar & Özenoğlu, 2018), and a laboratory self-efficacy scale (Akkuş, 2020). Moreover, there are also studies related to developing pre-service teachers' competences for science (Kazempour & Sadler, 2015;Knaggs & Sondergeld, 2015;Menon & Sadler, 2016), teaching science (Hechter, 2011;Mulholland & Wallace, 2001;Narayan & Lamp, 2010;Palmer, 2006;Ramey-Gassert & Shroyer, 1992;Velthuis et al, 2014) and the factors affecting the argumentation instruction (Atabey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Self-efficacy For Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the literature is examined, in terms of measuring self-efficacy in the field of science, a number of examples can be found, such as a science teaching self-efficacy belief scale, an environmental education self-efficacy scale (Özlü et al, 2013), a selfefficacy scale for laboratory practices in science teaching (Aka, 2016), a self-efficacy belief scale related to knowledge and instruction of the nature of science (Tatar & Özenoğlu, 2018), and a laboratory self-efficacy scale (Akkuş, 2020). Moreover, there are also studies related to developing pre-service teachers' competences for science (Kazempour & Sadler, 2015;Knaggs & Sondergeld, 2015;Menon & Sadler, 2016), teaching science (Hechter, 2011;Mulholland & Wallace, 2001;Narayan & Lamp, 2010;Palmer, 2006;Ramey-Gassert & Shroyer, 1992;Velthuis et al, 2014) and the factors affecting the argumentation instruction (Atabey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Self-efficacy For Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%