2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease: Toward a Mechanism-Based Classification

Abstract: The heterogeneity of von Willebrand disease reflects the varied roles of von Willebrand factor in coagulation. Significant challenges remain in the detection, classification, and determination of bleeding risk in disorders related to von Willebrand factor. A clearer understanding of the specific disease mechanisms is essential to the development of improved methods for prognosis and management in this and other conditions with abnormalities of the von Willebrand factor system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 There can be considerable genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity amongst patients with VWD, including heterogeneity in multimeric patterns, which is well known to present challenges for accurate disease subtyping. 1,6,7,[10][11][12][13] While our study demonstrates discordances between the 2 multimer testing methods in a minority of specimens (5 of 24), it should be emphasized that this is not necessarily due to differences between the methods themselves, but could also be due to the somewhat subjective nature of interpretation of this qualitative test designed primarily to determine presence or absence of the largest multimers. Previous publications have proposed arbitrary definitions to describe multimer distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 There can be considerable genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity amongst patients with VWD, including heterogeneity in multimeric patterns, which is well known to present challenges for accurate disease subtyping. 1,6,7,[10][11][12][13] While our study demonstrates discordances between the 2 multimer testing methods in a minority of specimens (5 of 24), it should be emphasized that this is not necessarily due to differences between the methods themselves, but could also be due to the somewhat subjective nature of interpretation of this qualitative test designed primarily to determine presence or absence of the largest multimers. Previous publications have proposed arbitrary definitions to describe multimer distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…None of the slight differences were considered clinically significant since multimeric pattern alone does not determine VWD diagnosis, subtype, or appropriate treatment, but requires close correlation with clinical information and the results of other testing . There can be considerable genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity amongst patients with VWD, including heterogeneity in multimeric patterns, which is well known to present challenges for accurate disease subtyping …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is normally present in plasma as a distribution of multimers containing anywhere from 2 to 40 or more vWF monomers. Abnormalities in vWF activity, most often related to abnormal concentration or multimer distribution, are the incident cause of the group of coagulopathies known as von Willebrand disease (vWD) (1, 2). As a group, vWD is considered to be the most common inherited coagulation disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Inhibitory antibodies in AvWS can sometimes be detected using neutralization assays of vWF:RCo, vWF:Ag, vWF:CB, or ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation; however, these assays are technically demanding, their sensitivity and specificity are unproven and will fail to detect non-neutralizing antibodies. 9,12 The non-neutralizing autoantibodies accelerate vWF clearance from the circulation without inhibiting the measurable functions of vWF. Non-neutralizing vWF-binding antibodies can be detected by ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%