2016
DOI: 10.1520/jte20150230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Study on Cement Slurry Formulation and Its Strength Mechanism for Semi-Flexible Pavement

Abstract: Semi-flexible pavement (SFP) combines the best features of both flexible asphalt and rigid cement concrete pavement. SFP consists of a porous asphalt mixture skeleton with 25 %–35 % voids, filled with selected cement slurry. To better balance the flexible and rigid characteristics between the asphalt mixture skeleton and hardened cement paste in SFP, a further understanding of its cement slurry formulation design is required. Results indicate that the penetrant has a significant effect on the fluidity of cemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workability of grouts can be significantly improved by adding a superplasticizer [ 77 ]. Most commonly, polycarboxylate ether- superplasticizers were used in various studies [ 70 , 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Performance Of Grouts And Semi-flexi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workability of grouts can be significantly improved by adding a superplasticizer [ 77 ]. Most commonly, polycarboxylate ether- superplasticizers were used in various studies [ 70 , 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Performance Of Grouts And Semi-flexi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers are the most traditional admixtures used in GSP, including latex, resin, SBS, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and waste rubber [74,84]. Latex and resin are efficient to smooth the high rigidity of HCM and reinforce the tensile strength of the whole structure because of their hydrophilicity, which results in bonding at interfaces between materials [56,76].…”
Section: Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai et al [22], Wang et al [6], Cai et al [23], and other scholars in their studies selected the grouting materials of single strengths, leading to a lack of comparability in the efects of diferent grouting material strengths on the SFP material performance. Te diference between the grouting material strengths chosen by Wang et al [25], Fang et al [28], and Imran Khan and Hartadi Sutanto [29] is not signifcant, and as a result, the improvements in the SFP material performance are not obvious, failing to obtain the substantial change pattern of the grouting material strength's infuence on the performance of SFP materials. Besides, the indicators employed in those studies to assess the infuence of grouting material strength on the performance of SFP materials are not very comprehensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the three-point bending fatigue test, Ren et al [27] explored the efects of two grouting materials with strengths of 12.18 MPa and 35.01 MPa on the fatigue performance of the SFP materials, and the results showed that the fatigue strength of SFP materials increased with the increase in the grouting material strength. Fang et al [28] examined the efect of grouting materials with strengths of 7.7 MPa and 10.2 MPa on the low-temperature crack resistance of SFP materials, and the results showed that the low-temperature crack resistance of SFP materials increased with the increase in the grouting material strength. Imran Khan and Hartadi Sutanto [29] studied the efect of grouting materials with strengths of 9.57 MPa and 12.36 MPa on the compressive strength of SFP materials, and the results showed that the compressive strength of SFP materials increased with the increase in the strength of grouting materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%