2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory scale tests for the assessment of solid explosive blast effects. Part II: Reflected blast series of tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the negative phase [12]. This is in agreement with findings from other researchers [18][19][20].…”
Section: Normal Reflectionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the negative phase [12]. This is in agreement with findings from other researchers [18][19][20].…”
Section: Normal Reflectionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, the test data suggests that it is possible to produce reliable and highly consistent, repeatable results if test conditions are carefully controlled; the implications of which have recently been discussed by the current authors [12]. This is in agreement with findings from other researchers [18][19][20].…”
Section: Normal Reflectionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…the well-established Kingery & Bulmash [1] scaled distance relationships, are largely derived from experiments conducted in the mid-20 th century [2]. Whilst these predictive methods have been shown to be highly accurate for geometrically simple far-field situations [3][4][5], blast parameter relationships in the nearfield are derived from very few experimental measurements [6] and are not able to accurately represent the complex situation that occurs in the early stages of an explosion [7,8]. Consequently, numerical analyses in this region demonstrate considerable deviation from semi-empirical predictions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, IrSN designed and built an experimental set-up to achieve non-destructive shock wave propagation studies on a small scale [1,2]. This set-up is composed of a modular table, sensors and targets able to perform the detonation of solid explosives up to 64 g of TNT equivalent, representing an alternative to the gas mixture detonation propagation configuration for small scale tests [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%