2015
DOI: 10.1260/2041-4196.6.1.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle of Incidence Effects on Far-Field Positive and Negative Phase Blast Parameters

Abstract: The oblique results show that peak overpressure, impulse and duration are highly dependent on angle of incidence for the positive phase, and are invariant of angle of incidence for the negative phase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9a. The angle of incidence, θ , at a point on the surface (denoted by the letter A in this figure) is defined as the angle between the outward normal of the surface and the direct vector from the explosive charge to that point [43]. Accordingly, tan(θ ) = x/y, where x is the distance along the target to the point of impingement, and y is the distance from the centre of the explosive to the point of impingement (termed stand-off distance).…”
Section: Reflected Pressure Calculations From Fireball Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9a. The angle of incidence, θ , at a point on the surface (denoted by the letter A in this figure) is defined as the angle between the outward normal of the surface and the direct vector from the explosive charge to that point [43]. Accordingly, tan(θ ) = x/y, where x is the distance along the target to the point of impingement, and y is the distance from the centre of the explosive to the point of impingement (termed stand-off distance).…”
Section: Reflected Pressure Calculations From Fireball Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localised increases in reflected pressure can be seen in the HSV predictions for the 80 mm tests at a distance from the plate centre, x, of approximately 65 mm (θ = 40 • ) as a result of the Mach stem. The pressure increase 3 The apparent decrease in pressure at the centre of the plate in the 380 mm tests is as a result of averaging over a limited dataset (only 1 Hopkinson pressure bar per test, giving a total of 3 data points) rather than being a genuine physical feature of the loading distribution caused by the Mach Stem persists only for a short duration before being followed by a marked temporal decrease in pressure and rapid return to regular reflection conditions thereafter [43]. The disagreement between HPB and HSV pressures at 75 mm from the plate centre in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To Directly Measured Peak Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the mesh sensitivity analysis are shown in Figure 4, each sub-figure shows: peak overpressure; peak specific impulse and total analysis time (termed 'wall time'), all plotted against the ratio of stand-off distance, S , to ultimate cell length. The solid black line shows the average experimental value from Rigby et al (2015) and the dashed line shows a 10% variation from the experimental value. More information on the experiments is provided below in Experimental validation.…”
Section: Validation Of Apollo Blastsimulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental validation. Rigby et al (2015) present a series of experimental trials where pressure gauges, embedded flush with the surface of a large, reinforced concrete bunker wall, were used to record reflected pressure histories from 0.18 to 0.35 kg PE4 hemispheres located 2 to 10 m from the bunker wall. The experimental set-up is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Validation Of Apollo Blastsimulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this fitting, the key parameters of the positive phase can be extracted. See Chiquito et al (2019) and Rigby et al (2015) for more details. Finally, the TNT equivalent is calculated and the value obtained was 0,855.…”
Section: Field Blast Testing Programmentioning
confidence: 99%