2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(01)00009-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory investigation of bearing capacity behavior of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…loose and medium dense sand) materials can substantially be improved by introducing the reinforcing elements, like geogrids, geotextiles etc., within the significant zone of influence with a suitable layout arrangement and configuration. The beneficial effects of using tensile reinforcement to increase the bearing capacity of soil have been clearly demonstrated by several investigators (Binquet and Lee 1975a, b;Akinmusuru and Akinbolade 1981;Das and Larbi-Cherif 1983;Fragaszy and Lawton 1984;Guido et al 1986;Huang and Tatsuoka 1990;Dixit and Mandal 1993;Khing et al 1993;Murthy et al 1993;Omar et al 1993a, b;Yetimoglu et al 1994;Adams and Collin 1997;Yoo 2001;Kumar and Saran 2001;2003a, b, c;2004;Kumar et al 2005). For designing foundations subjected to earthquake forces, adopting appropriate values of horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients, equivalent seismic forces can be conveniently evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…loose and medium dense sand) materials can substantially be improved by introducing the reinforcing elements, like geogrids, geotextiles etc., within the significant zone of influence with a suitable layout arrangement and configuration. The beneficial effects of using tensile reinforcement to increase the bearing capacity of soil have been clearly demonstrated by several investigators (Binquet and Lee 1975a, b;Akinmusuru and Akinbolade 1981;Das and Larbi-Cherif 1983;Fragaszy and Lawton 1984;Guido et al 1986;Huang and Tatsuoka 1990;Dixit and Mandal 1993;Khing et al 1993;Murthy et al 1993;Omar et al 1993a, b;Yetimoglu et al 1994;Adams and Collin 1997;Yoo 2001;Kumar and Saran 2001;2003a, b, c;2004;Kumar et al 2005). For designing foundations subjected to earthquake forces, adopting appropriate values of horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients, equivalent seismic forces can be conveniently evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Different parameters used in the Figure 1 are D e -edge distance from slope crest, B -width of footing, z-embedment depth and L r -length of reinforcement respectively and their values used in model test is shown in Table 1. Yoo (2001) reported that for deriving maximum improvement in ultimate bearing capacity the optimum L r /B ratio (L r = length of reinforcement, B=Width of footing) should be in the range of 6.0-8.0. Michalowski (1997) reported that the length of reinforcement should be 0.65 times the slope height to prevent collapse of slope due to reinforcement rupture, pullout or direct sliding.…”
Section: Preparation Of Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the length of reinforcement for the present investigation was also kept constant as 7.0B throughout the study. Yoo (2001), EI Sawwaf (2007), Alamshahi and Hataf (2009) reported that for deriving maximum improvement in load bearing capacity of reinforced slope, the vertical spacing between reinforcements should be in the range of 0.50B-0.75B. Thanapalasingam and Gnanendran (2008) advocated embedment depth for the first and second layer as 0.25B and 0.50B from the ground surface of sloped fill for multiple reinforcement layers (N = 4, where N is the number of reinforcement layers).…”
Section: Preparation Of Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, different kinds of countermeasures, such as geosynthetics, including geogrids and geotextiles, had been widely performed to ensure the stability of these artificial slopes (Lee and Manjunath 2000;Yoo 2001;Blatz and Bathurst 2001). However, due to its complexity, these artificial slopes should be real-time monitored to ensure the stability, even after the welldesigned countermeasures had been carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%