2016
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 This is explained by the impact of glycolysis on the fasting sample under customary conditions. 22 The current IADPSG diagnostic criteria for GDM were based on previous NACB laboratory standards (use of an ice slurry and cell separation within 60 minutes). 12 It is possible, therefore, that the higher incidence of GDM using the IADPSG criteria and stricter NACB standards (use of an ice slurry and cell separation within 30 minutes) in this study, has resulted in a 'recalibration' of the fasting value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…15 This is explained by the impact of glycolysis on the fasting sample under customary conditions. 22 The current IADPSG diagnostic criteria for GDM were based on previous NACB laboratory standards (use of an ice slurry and cell separation within 60 minutes). 12 It is possible, therefore, that the higher incidence of GDM using the IADPSG criteria and stricter NACB standards (use of an ice slurry and cell separation within 30 minutes) in this study, has resulted in a 'recalibration' of the fasting value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National surveys in Europe have shown that the customary pre-analytical handling of glucose samples does not adhere to the NACB recommendations. 22 One possible solution to the challenge of in vitro glycolysis in OGTT samples is point-of-care (POC) testing. 14,15,[19][20][21] We have therefore suggested that the customary practice of using FE tubes without strict implementation of the NACB recommendations (placement on an ice-slurry, centrifugation and analysis within 30 minutes) should be abandoned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We excluded 95 studies in total (including nine duplicates); 31 were conducted in high income setting; 17 studies were excluded because they did not follow EPOC study design recommendations (Akter et al, 2012;Caut et al, 2019;Della Libera et al, 2011;Gila-Diaz et al, 2021;Jindal et al, 2021;Kamudoni et al, 2016;Nair et al, 2020;NCT04694235, 2021;Parra et al, 2005;Rifayanto et al, 2021;Santos et al, 2013;Selvakumar, 2015;Shimpuku et al, 2019;Thaver et al, 2020;Wijaya-Erhardt et al, 2014); 14 studies targeted participants that were not relevant to this review (dos Santos et al, 2019;Fayasari et al, 2019;Fernald et al, 2016;Kimani-Murage et al, 2013;Kimani-Murage et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2017;Mwangi et al, 2020;Nguyen et al, 2021;Nugraheni et al, 2020;Owais et al, 2017;Scherbaum et al, 2017;Stewart et al, 2020); 10 did not have a nutrition counseling intervention for pregnant women (Abrha et al, 2020;Diddana et al, 2018;Fan et al, 2010;Ferrari et al, 2020;Gomes et al, 2019;Hajian et al, 2020;Pawalia et al, 2020;RBR-5jy777, 2019;Sahran et al, 2021;Swaminathan, 2015;…”
Section: Excluded Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do not specify which method to be used to analyze P-glucose [2,5,6]. Some studies indicate that the glucose levels in capillary and venous plasma are not interchangeable, especially not in the non-fasting condition [7,8], but there is controversy about whether capillary plasma samples can be used for diagnosing GDM [9]. There are several advantages with capillary sampling, as it is easier to perform and requires simpler equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%