Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of women’s body mass index (BMI) on the probability of a successful external cephalic version (ECV). Material and methods A retrospective population‐based observational study including all women that underwent an ECV in the southeast region of Sweden from January 2014 to December 2019. Data were collected from electronic medical records, Obstetrix, Cerner. The women were divided into BMI categories according to the World Health Organization classification. Women with a BMI below 25 kg/m2 formed the reference group. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for unsuccessful ECV in each BMI group were calculated using binary logistic regression. Furthermore, the association between maternal characteristics and clinical and ultrasound variables at the time of the ECV and unsuccessful ECV was evaluated. Results A total of 2331 women were included. The overall success rate of ECV was 53.4%. Women with a BMI below 25 kg/m2 had a success rate of 51.3% whereas obese women had a success rate of 58.6%. The risk of an unsuccessful ECV among obese women (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) had an OR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59–0.94) compared with women with a BMI below 25 kg/m2. After adjusting for suitable confounding factors, the association was no longer significant. Higher maternal age, multiparity, higher gestational age, posterior placenta position, polyhydramnios and higher estimated weight of the fetus at the ECV significantly decreased the risk of an unsuccessful ECV. Conclusions Maternal obesity does not seem to negatively influence the success rate of ECV. This is a finding that may encourage both caregivers and obese pregnant women to consider an ECV and so avoid a planned cesarean section for breech presentation in this group.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication with negative impacts on mother and child. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether plasma glucose cutoffs for GDM diagnosis based on venous sampling can be replaced by cutoffs based on capillary sampling. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at an antenatal care clinic including 175 pregnant women undergoing an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Duplicate samples were collected by capillary and venous puncture while fasting and 1 h and 2 h after an OGTT. Both samples were analyzed on Accu-Chek Inform II. The cutoffs for a GDM diagnosis using capillary samples were corrected from 5.1 to 5.3 mmol/L for the fasting sample, from 10.0 to 11.1 mmol/L for the 1 h sample, and from 8.5 to 9.4 mmol/L for the 2-h sample using half of the dataset. Applying these cutoffs to the remaining dataset resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.0%, 95.0%, and 90.3%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, an negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%, and a positive negative likelihood ratio (LHR) of 16.4 using capillary sampling for the GDM diagnosis at fasting and 2-h after. Corrected cutoffs and capillary samples can be used for the diagnosis of GDM with maintained diagnostic accuracy using Accu-Chek Inform II.

No abstract

Introduction:Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women without GDM, including an increased risk for having labor induced and for cesarean section. The findings from previous studies analyzing duration of labor in women with GDM are contradictory.The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of GDM on time in spontaneous and induced active labor. Material and methods:This was a population-based cohort study including 247 524 primiparous women who gave birth to a singleton fetus with cephalic presentation, ≥34 +0 (completed gestational weeks + additional days) between January 2014 and May 2020 in Sweden. Data was obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Time in active labor was compared between women with GDM and without GDM with a spontaneous labor onset or induction of labor using Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis.Results: Women with GDM had significantly longer time in active labor, both with a spontaneous onset and induction of labor compared to women without GDM.Women with GDM had a decreased chance of vaginal delivery at a certain time-point compared to women without GDM, with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.92 (0.88-0.96) and 0.83 (0.76-0.90) for those with spontaneous onset and induction of labor, respectively. Women with GDM had increased risk for time in active labor ≥12 h both in spontaneous labor onset (adjusted odds ratio 1. 14 [1.04-1.25]) and in induction of labor (adjusted odds ratio 1. 55 [1.28-1.87]). Conclusions:Women with GDM seem to spend a longer time in active labor, both in spontaneous and induced active labor compared to women without GDM. To be able to individualize care intrapartum, there is a need for more studies demonstrating the impact of hyperglycemia during pregnancy on outcomes during childbirth.