2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label space reduction based on LSP multiplexing in MPLS Openflow hybrid network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on protection is on-going to ensure that networks can promptly react to failures. SDN is also [21] 2018 further improved the load balancing and resource utilisation of the network with SDN Huang et al [23] 2018 overcame the label space reduction problem in MPLS network Guo et al [20] 2017 improved measurement error issues when using the single traffic matrix Mazhin et al [24] 2017 improved network flexibility MPLS-TE Premkumar and Saminadan. [2] 2017 enhanced network resiliency for sensitive protection data MPLS DiffServ Eugen [5] 2017 presented simulation results that proved the benefits of DiffServ in terms of delay integration of MPLS-TP Kurimoto et al [6] 2017 reconfigurable optical adddrop multiplexers to create nationwide burden with SDN Kurimoto et al [37] 2016 intra-and inter-domain network-enabled generic model transport for SDN and MPLS-TP network Lim et al [36] 2016 automatic topology discovery in the MPLS-TP network MPLS-TP protection Kim et al [44] 2018 achieved fast traffic recovery and relieved the communication burden Kolhar et al [40] 2016 reduced fault recovery time by 27 ms and decreased traffic load Blair et al [42] 2016 achieved 50 ms protection switching time Bächli et al [43] 2016 achieved guaranteed performance for critical application even under extreme conditions Choi [48] 2016 significant growth of data buffer hit ratio Kim et al [55] 2016 network availability subject to the maximised subprotection switching time of 50 ms Pijanka and Rózański.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on protection is on-going to ensure that networks can promptly react to failures. SDN is also [21] 2018 further improved the load balancing and resource utilisation of the network with SDN Huang et al [23] 2018 overcame the label space reduction problem in MPLS network Guo et al [20] 2017 improved measurement error issues when using the single traffic matrix Mazhin et al [24] 2017 improved network flexibility MPLS-TE Premkumar and Saminadan. [2] 2017 enhanced network resiliency for sensitive protection data MPLS DiffServ Eugen [5] 2017 presented simulation results that proved the benefits of DiffServ in terms of delay integration of MPLS-TP Kurimoto et al [6] 2017 reconfigurable optical adddrop multiplexers to create nationwide burden with SDN Kurimoto et al [37] 2016 intra-and inter-domain network-enabled generic model transport for SDN and MPLS-TP network Lim et al [36] 2016 automatic topology discovery in the MPLS-TP network MPLS-TP protection Kim et al [44] 2018 achieved fast traffic recovery and relieved the communication burden Kolhar et al [40] 2016 reduced fault recovery time by 27 ms and decreased traffic load Blair et al [42] 2016 achieved 50 ms protection switching time Bächli et al [43] 2016 achieved guaranteed performance for critical application even under extreme conditions Choi [48] 2016 significant growth of data buffer hit ratio Kim et al [55] 2016 network availability subject to the maximised subprotection switching time of 50 ms Pijanka and Rózański.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the bandwidth and complexity increase, a shortage of MPLS labels will occur. Huang et al [23] claimed that label consumption is expanding rapidly, thereby leading to management complexity, increased operational and capital expenditure and table look-up latency, and reduced performance and scalability. Therefore, the author proposed a method of solving the label space reduction problem in the MPLS network using a hybrid MPLS Open-Flow network scheme via LSP multiplexing.…”
Section: Software-defined Network For Mpls-tementioning
confidence: 99%