2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La visite parentale chez l’enfant placé, une revue de la littérature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, another explanatory factor is the amount and type of abuse and neglect experienced by the child before the placement (Jones & Morris, 2012; Tarren‐Sweeney, 2008). Finally, the child's psychological health is also influenced by the fact that caregivers working in institutions do not solicit a reduction or suspension of contact with his or her parent when visits are of poor quality (Barnum, 1987; Déprez & Wendland, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, another explanatory factor is the amount and type of abuse and neglect experienced by the child before the placement (Jones & Morris, 2012; Tarren‐Sweeney, 2008). Finally, the child's psychological health is also influenced by the fact that caregivers working in institutions do not solicit a reduction or suspension of contact with his or her parent when visits are of poor quality (Barnum, 1987; Déprez & Wendland, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the complex range of factors that influence contact, authors such as Déprez and Wendland () emphasize the need to conduct more research about the maintenance of contact between the child or young person and their family, its quality, and specifically about the circumstances in which family contact for children and young people may or may not be beneficial.…”
Section: Contact Importance and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the complex range of factors that influence contact, authors such as Déprez and Wendland (2015) emphasize the need to conduct more research about the maintenance of contact between the child or young person and their family, its quality, and specifically about the circumstances in which family contact for children and young people may or may not be beneficial. This paper offers a Portuguese perspective on some of the issues discussed in the section above relating to family contact in foster family care, reporting on the views of children, parents, foster carers, and social workers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os contactos foram habitualmente uma prática habitual na intervenção e no contacto básico entre as Casas e as famílias (Déprez & Wendland, 2015;Leathers, 2002;León & Palacios, 2004). Embora haja diversas visões sobre os benefícios das visitas, existe um consenso em que estas permitem avaliar e reforçar a relação entre as crianças e as famílias diminuindo a sensação de separação e abandono (Amorós & Palacios, 2004;Carnochan, Lee, & Austin, 2013;Déprez & Wendland, 2015;León & Palacios, 2004;López, Del Valle, Montserrat, & Bravo Arteaga, 2013;Sen, 2010;Sen & Broadhurst, 2011).…”
Section: Avaliação Resiliência Acolhimento E Reunificaçãounclassified