La pregunta de investigación en la práctica clínica: guía para formularla

Cañón, Martín; Buitrago-Gómez, Quiteria

doi:10.1016/j.rcp.2016.06.004

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A estratégia utilizada para estruturar a questão de pesquisa foi a PICO. Este formato inclui população (P); intervenção, exposição ou técnica de diagnóstico (I, E ou T, respectivamente); comparação (C) e o desfecho (O, do Inglês outcomes) (CAÑÓN; BUITRAGO-GÓMEZ, 2018). O uso dessa estratégia para formular a questão de pesquisa na condução de métodos da revisão viabiliza a identificação de palavras-chave, as quais auxiliam na localização de estudos primários relevantes nas bases de dados (GARCIA et al, 2016).…”

Section: Métodounclassified

Contribuições Da Enfermagem À Segurança Do Paciente: Uma Revisão Integrativa Da Literatura

Bacelar,

Parente,

Santo

et al. 2022

Pesquisa E Extensão: Abordagem Interdisciplinar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Métodounclassified

Contribuições Da Enfermagem À Segurança Do Paciente: Uma Revisão Integrativa Da Literatura

Bacelar,

Parente,

Santo

et al. 2022

Pesquisa E Extensão: Abordagem Interdisciplinar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Son diferentes las que se originan del intercambio de información médico-paciente, que las que se generan para lograr mayor conocimiento. Es así como se podrían diferenciar en: Preguntas Clínicas y Preguntas de Investigación (5,6) . Ambas requieren del mismo y predeterminado proceso (Figura 1).…”

Section: Evidencia Disponibleunclassified

¿es La Revisión Sistemática El Mejor Estudio Para Tomar Decisiones en Salud?

Kappes

Pacheco²

2018

Horiz Enferm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENObjetivo: Definir el mejor diseño de investigación para la práctica de enfermería. Metodología: se realiza una revisión narrativa con los términos MeSH: Alfabetización Informacional, Estudios Epidemiológicos, Medicina Basada en la Evidencia, Enfermería basada en evidencia en las bases de datos PUBMED, ProQuest, Ebsco, Ovid. Síntesis del contenido: Se realiza una síntesis de los diseños de investigación disponibles y su utilidad al momento de responder una pregunta de investigación. Conclusiones: La mejor evidencia disponible son las revisiones sistemáticas y el enfoque de investigación mixto. Su uso para práctica basada en evidencia asegura que podamos sustentar nuestros cuidados de manera eficiente y segura.

show abstract

“…This methodological strategy has helped support the development of evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations, which are the second best available source of scientific literature when SRLs are based on randomized clinical trials, according to the evidence pyramid (1). This secondary or integrative research design allows to answer a research question according to population, intervention, comparator and outcomes (3), given that it analyzes the results of a set of original research and provides an answer in a short period of time and at a lower cost than that of a primary study (3).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR tool

Pizarro

Carvajal

Buitrago-López

2020

Colomb. J. Anesthesiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Making decisions based on evidence has been a challenge for health professionals, given the need to have the tools and skills to carry out a critical appraisal of the evidence and assess the validity of the results. Systematic reviews of the literature (SRL) have been used widely to answer questions in the clinical field. Tools have been developed that support the appraisal of the quality of the studies. AMSTAR is one of these, validated and supported by reproducible evidence, which guides the methodological quality of the SRL. Objectives: To show a historical, theoretical and practical guide for critical assessment of systematic reviews using AMSTAR to guide the argumental bases for their use according to the components of this methodological structure in health research, and to provide practical examples of how to apply this checklist. Methods: We conducted a non-exhaustive review of literature in Pubmed and Cochrane Library using “AMSTAR” and “Systematic Reviews” as free terms without language or publication date limit; we also collected information from experts in the evaluation of the quality of the evidence. Conclusions: AMSTAR is an instrument used, validated and supported by reproducible evidence for the evaluation of the internal validity of systematic reviews of the literature. It consists of 16 items that assess the overall methodological quality of an SRL. It is currently used indiscriminately and favorably, but it is not exempt from limitations and future updates based on new reproducibility and validation studies.

show abstract

La pregunta de investigación en la práctica clínica: guía para formularla

Cited by 12 publications

References 20 publications

Contribuições Da Enfermagem À Segurança Do Paciente: Uma Revisão Integrativa Da Literatura

Contribuições Da Enfermagem À Segurança Do Paciente: Uma Revisão Integrativa Da Literatura

¿es La Revisión Sistemática El Mejor Estudio Para Tomar Decisiones en Salud?

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR tool

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About