Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR tool

Abstract

Introduction: Making decisions based on evidence has been a challenge for health professionals, given the need to have the tools and skills to carry out a critical appraisal of the evidence and assess the validity of the results. Systematic reviews of the literature (SRL) have been used widely to answer questions in the clinical field. Tools have been developed that support the appraisal of the quality of the studies. AMSTAR is one of these, validated and supported by reproducible evidence, which guides the methodological quality of the SRL.
 Objectives: To show a historical, theoretical and practical guide for critical assessment of systematic reviews using AMSTAR to guide the argumental bases for their use according to the components of this methodological structure in health research, and to provide practical examples of how to apply this checklist.
 Methods: We conducted a non-exhaustive review of literature in Pubmed and Cochrane Library using “AMSTAR” and “Systematic Reviews” as free terms without language or publication date limit; we also collected information from experts in the evaluation of the quality of the evidence.
 Conclusions: AMSTAR is an instrument used, validated and supported by reproducible evidence for the evaluation of the internal validity of systematic reviews of the literature. It consists of 16 items that assess the overall methodological quality of an SRL. It is currently used indiscriminately and favorably, but it is not exempt from limitations and future updates based on new reproducibility and validation studies.

Estudio del proceso indagatorio inherente a una revisión sistemática documental Prisma 2020 con empleo de metaanálisis

“…Es importante destacar que el registro de protocolos para la realización de RS es una práctica necesaria y valorada en el ámbito de la investigación clínica. No obstante, en las RS en ciencias sociales, este proceso representa un desafío para que cada una de las etapas de la RS estén disponibles en plataformas digitales de acceso libre y con fortaleza académica, como mencionan Pizarro et al (2020).…”

The evolution of TAVI performance overtime: an overview of systematic reviews

“…If the requested data could not be retrieved, the study was not included in the analysis. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) [5] was adopted to perform a rapid and reproducible critical assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies. Finally, studies whose methodological quality was judged to be critically low according to the AMSTAR assessment tool were excluded.…”

Intervenciones basadas en psicología positiva para adultos mayores: una revisión sistemática

“…La calidad de los estudios fue determinada a partir de la calificación de los siete ítems de la escala de Jadad et al (1996), la cual, aunque fue desarrollada para ser aplicada en ensayos clínicos, es una herramienta muy frecuentemente utilizada para establecer de forma independiente la calidad metodológica de estudios relacionados con la evaluación de intervenciones en el campo de la salud, contiene elementos importantes que permiten la detección de sesgos, ha mostrado poseer confiabilidad y validez externa y su empleo permite la generación de recomendaciones para mejorar la evidencia existente (Castaño-García et al, 2018;Pizarro et al, 2021). Se considera que un estudio tiene una calidad pobre o baja si obtiene una puntuación menor a 3 puntos y moderada si obtiene una puntuación de 5 puntos.…”