2014
DOI: 10.3917/sopr.029.0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La place du genre dans les revendications mémorielles gays et lesbiennes

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Presses de Sciences Po. © Presses de Sciences Po. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, considering the super‐diverse makeup of LGBT communities, I argued that the reductive label ‘homo’ in the monument's title might have a misinforming, male‐dominating emotional‐connotative impact. However, the unified and easily identifiable ‘we’ could precisely entail an emotionally effective strategy of wider LGBT activism (see Schlagdenhauffen ). Yet, ambivalently, strategic inclusionary rhetoric might meet exclusionary practice, and the other way round.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, considering the super‐diverse makeup of LGBT communities, I argued that the reductive label ‘homo’ in the monument's title might have a misinforming, male‐dominating emotional‐connotative impact. However, the unified and easily identifiable ‘we’ could precisely entail an emotionally effective strategy of wider LGBT activism (see Schlagdenhauffen ). Yet, ambivalently, strategic inclusionary rhetoric might meet exclusionary practice, and the other way round.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%