Brouillons Pour L’avenir
DOI: 10.4000/books.iheid.2430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La petite différence et ses grandes conséquences : possession et propriété

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For, as pointed out by Steppacher [8][9][10][11], capitalisation not only allows for growth: it imposes it. This results from the contractual obligations debtors must fulfil once they have engaged property as collateral in a credit contract: refund the loan and pay the interest in due time.…”
Section: The Potentials and Constraints Of The Credit Relationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For, as pointed out by Steppacher [8][9][10][11], capitalisation not only allows for growth: it imposes it. This results from the contractual obligations debtors must fulfil once they have engaged property as collateral in a credit contract: refund the loan and pay the interest in due time.…”
Section: The Potentials and Constraints Of The Credit Relationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such an examination was recently carried out by two German economists, Gunnar Heinsohn and Otto Steiger [4][5][6][7], and was elaborated further by Steppacher [8][9][10][11] and van Griethuysen [12][13][14][15], who integrated property economics findings into the analytical framework of critical institutional and ecological economics. We summarise their argument here and elaborate on some of their findings, adopting an evolutionary perspective much in the same vein as the precursory analysis of capital developed by Thorstein Veblen in the early 20th century [16][17][18].…”
Section: Property As the Constitutive Institution Of Capitalist Economentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 perspective, les différences physiologiques ne sont pas niées. Mais elles ne sont pas déterminantes per se des destins et inégalités sociales (Schwarzer 1977). Pour ce courant du féminisme le sujet politique transcende la sexuation, l'égalité sociale est incompatible avec la revendication de la différence féminine.…”
unclassified
“…Pour un traitement plus détaillé de celle-ci, voir, en plus de Heinsohn et Steiger (1996, Steppacher (1999Steppacher ( , 2003, Steppacher et Griethuysen (2002.…”
unclassified