1996
DOI: 10.3406/rural.1996.3555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La montagne ariégeoise entre friche et paysage : un consensus illusoire ?

Abstract: Appliqué en Ariège dès 1990, l'article 19 est venu renforcer la politique agro-pastorale menée depuis plus de vingt ans par le conseil général. Celle-ci s'est révélée incapable d'intégrer des objectifs relevant de l'aménagement rural. La nouvelle procédure représente une opportunité, tant pour la profession agricole divisée d'élargir le champ de ses compétences, que pour le conseil général de reconstruire son identité. L'argument paysager, outre qu'il introduit une sensibilité écologique, a permis d'atteindre … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They appear useless to society from an economic point of view (unexploited) as well as an aesthetic point of view, because some consider that they mar the landscape (Liou, 1991). Innumerable landscape effects are attributed to abandoned farmland, such as the loss of scenic and environmental qualities (Perez, 1990), the closure of mountain landscapes (Barrué-Pastor and Fournié, 1996), the disappearance of contours and the loss of spatial hierarchies (Chambres d'agriculture, 1991). All of these negative visual effects foster various feelings that range from an impression of abandonment and isolation, of oppression, of suppression of contact with neighbours (Chambres d'agriculture, 1991), to feelings of insecurity and poverty (Barrué-Pastor and Fournié, 1996); some have even called abandoned farmland a shameful disease of the French soil (Goislard, 1954).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They appear useless to society from an economic point of view (unexploited) as well as an aesthetic point of view, because some consider that they mar the landscape (Liou, 1991). Innumerable landscape effects are attributed to abandoned farmland, such as the loss of scenic and environmental qualities (Perez, 1990), the closure of mountain landscapes (Barrué-Pastor and Fournié, 1996), the disappearance of contours and the loss of spatial hierarchies (Chambres d'agriculture, 1991). All of these negative visual effects foster various feelings that range from an impression of abandonment and isolation, of oppression, of suppression of contact with neighbours (Chambres d'agriculture, 1991), to feelings of insecurity and poverty (Barrué-Pastor and Fournié, 1996); some have even called abandoned farmland a shameful disease of the French soil (Goislard, 1954).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economic terms, society deems them useless. Some believe that the closure of mountain landscapes (Barrué-Pastor and Fournié, 1996), the disappearance of contours, and the loss of spatial hierarchies deface the landscape (Liou, 1991;Perez, 1990). These visual effects can prompt negative feelings of apathy and disaffection.…”
Section: Stakeholders' Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%