2020
DOI: 10.14201/scero202051383103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La incidencia del apoyo social comunitario en la calidad de vida de personas con discapacidad

Abstract: La posición, identidad y rol social determinan los niveles de interacción positiva con nuestro entorno y, por ende, la capacidad del individuo para construir un tejido social estable que repercuta en los recursos psicosociales de la persona para afrontar sucesos de índole estresante. El estigma, el aislamiento y el desajuste de los roles sociales positivos fomentan la creación de espacios de exclusión en los que las personas con discapacidad intelectual ven imposibilitado el desarrollo de un plan de vida autón… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association between disability and EPS, shown in Table 4 , confirms the first hypothesis of this manuscript, showing an inverse and significant relationship between EPS and disability. This result, similar to that obtained in previous studies for quality of life [ 38 ], indicates that the group of women with disabilities perceives lower EPS, being more vulnerable to problems related to the lack of emotional and personal support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The association between disability and EPS, shown in Table 4 , confirms the first hypothesis of this manuscript, showing an inverse and significant relationship between EPS and disability. This result, similar to that obtained in previous studies for quality of life [ 38 ], indicates that the group of women with disabilities perceives lower EPS, being more vulnerable to problems related to the lack of emotional and personal support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%