2018
DOI: 10.7202/1043295ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La gestion commune au sein des couples : une question de mariage ou pas ?

Abstract: Dans plusieurs pays, on observe que les couples mariés tendent à gérer ensemble leur argent alors que les couples en union libre sont plus enclins à le gérer séparément. L’objectif de cet article est de déterminer si ces différences sont aussi présentes au Québec où les unions libres sont largement répandues et d’identifier d’autres variables que l’état matrimonial pour expliquer ces différences. L’étude s’appuie sur une enquête québécoise inédite (n = 3246) réalisée en 2015 par Belleau et collab. (2017) et po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commitment, in turn, justifies pooling of resources with the aim of minimizing transaction costs (Treas, 1993 ), leading to a more efficient relationship. Conversely, lower commitment and the uncertainty about the outcome of cohabitation would make resource pooling riskier among cohabiters, and separation of resources more efficient (Belleau et al, 2017 ; Treas, 1993 ). However, those cohabiters who are committed, e.g.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commitment, in turn, justifies pooling of resources with the aim of minimizing transaction costs (Treas, 1993 ), leading to a more efficient relationship. Conversely, lower commitment and the uncertainty about the outcome of cohabitation would make resource pooling riskier among cohabiters, and separation of resources more efficient (Belleau et al, 2017 ; Treas, 1993 ). However, those cohabiters who are committed, e.g.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unmarried partners are not legally responsible for one another, and their economic resources are not protected in the eventuality of union dissolution (Wilmoth & Koso, 2002 ). For this reason, cohabiting partners would be less inclined to pool their resources and poll their wealth than married spouses, even though many may be ignorant of the legal rules that apply to unmarried couples in the eventuality of break-up (Belleau et al, 2017 ). For instance, in Italy, and many other European countries, cohabiting partners have no rights to alimony payments after union break-up; in a handful of countries they have some rights, though fewer than married partners, and only in Slovenia cohabiters have the same rights than married spouses (Miho & Thévenon, 2020 ).…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%