2010
DOI: 10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2010.161.18494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La désindustrialisation brésilienne: une lecture marxiste

Abstract: <p>La financiarización de la economía brasileña con frecuencia es señalada como la mayor responsable de la disminución de la velocidad del proceso de acumulación en ese país. Así, tipos de interés muy elevados, particularmente con el fin de financiar la deuda pública, incitan más a adquirir bonos del tesoro que a invertir en la esfera productiva. Sin embargo, la evolución del índice de provecho en esta última también explica la relación de los empresarios con la inversión. En efecto, el fin del "milagro … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While GDP grows less, capital productivity may increase. Gaulard (2010) agrees, while the OECD (2007) says that it has increased the elasticity of labour in GDP, from 0.4 to 1.2 between 1992-6 and 2000-4, the largest rise in emerging countries (BRIC), increasing the use of labour with respect to fixed capital. mild recession in the mid-1960s), and is led by the accumulation of capital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While GDP grows less, capital productivity may increase. Gaulard (2010) agrees, while the OECD (2007) says that it has increased the elasticity of labour in GDP, from 0.4 to 1.2 between 1992-6 and 2000-4, the largest rise in emerging countries (BRIC), increasing the use of labour with respect to fixed capital. mild recession in the mid-1960s), and is led by the accumulation of capital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows the comparative profile (1950 = 100) of PK and its determinants. 17 From 1950 to 1980, the high rate of accumulation and the continuous renovation of capital equipment (Gaulard 2010) allowed for an increase in labor productivity, but this did not prevent a fall in capital productivity. The limited and relatively inefficient capital-goods production sector caused (although with a reciprocal relationship) both a fall in the productive efficiency of investment (θ) and a rise in the relative price deflator for capital goods.…”
Section: Determinants Of Capital Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation