“…Defining 'information quality' is not an easy task, since the very epistemology of 'quality' has subjective connotations, or is at least dependent on cultural perceptions-with specific standards linked to norms and values (Leggatt, 1996;Michnik & Lo, 2009;Rosengren, Tagerud, & Carlsson, 1996). In fact, it is almost impossible to reach a consensus on the meaning of 'information quality' among journalists, academics, and audiences (Baskarada & Koronios, 2014;Gómez-Mompart, Gutiérrez-Lozano, & Palau-Sampio, 2013;Urban & Schweiger, 2014;Wallisch, 1995), because while for the latter 'quality' may reflect the expositive clarity of the message, or be implicit in the brand of the medium it publishes, information quality for a journalist may be related to the time it has taken him to access suitable sources and verify information (Baskarada & Koronios, 2014;Gómez-Mompart et al, 2013;Urban & Schweiger, 2014;Wallisch, 1995). On the other hand, from an academic point of view, there have been several proposals on quality, being the main ones identified in Table 1.…”