2014
DOI: 10.7203/puv-alg26-9164-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La calidad periodística : Teorías, investigaciones y sugerencias profesionales

Abstract: Comunicación y Medios n. 29 (2014). El lugar y función de la imagen en la construcción de los grandes imaginarios latinoamericanos.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining 'information quality' is not an easy task, since the very epistemology of 'quality' has subjective connotations, or is at least dependent on cultural perceptions-with specific standards linked to norms and values (Leggatt, 1996;Michnik & Lo, 2009;Rosengren, Tagerud, & Carlsson, 1996). In fact, it is almost impossible to reach a consensus on the meaning of 'information quality' among journalists, academics, and audiences (Baskarada & Koronios, 2014;Gómez-Mompart, Gutiérrez-Lozano, & Palau-Sampio, 2013;Urban & Schweiger, 2014;Wallisch, 1995), because while for the latter 'quality' may reflect the expositive clarity of the message, or be implicit in the brand of the medium it publishes, information quality for a journalist may be related to the time it has taken him to access suitable sources and verify information (Baskarada & Koronios, 2014;Gómez-Mompart et al, 2013;Urban & Schweiger, 2014;Wallisch, 1995). On the other hand, from an academic point of view, there have been several proposals on quality, being the main ones identified in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining 'information quality' is not an easy task, since the very epistemology of 'quality' has subjective connotations, or is at least dependent on cultural perceptions-with specific standards linked to norms and values (Leggatt, 1996;Michnik & Lo, 2009;Rosengren, Tagerud, & Carlsson, 1996). In fact, it is almost impossible to reach a consensus on the meaning of 'information quality' among journalists, academics, and audiences (Baskarada & Koronios, 2014;Gómez-Mompart, Gutiérrez-Lozano, & Palau-Sampio, 2013;Urban & Schweiger, 2014;Wallisch, 1995), because while for the latter 'quality' may reflect the expositive clarity of the message, or be implicit in the brand of the medium it publishes, information quality for a journalist may be related to the time it has taken him to access suitable sources and verify information (Baskarada & Koronios, 2014;Gómez-Mompart et al, 2013;Urban & Schweiger, 2014;Wallisch, 1995). On the other hand, from an academic point of view, there have been several proposals on quality, being the main ones identified in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%