2000
DOI: 10.1076/0958-8221(200002)13:1;1-k;ft005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2 Morphosyntactic Development in Text-Based Computer-Mediated Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, with regard to grammatical development, contrary to previous research which had stated that AudCMC dyads only managed to reach 45% of complete understanding of target lexicons being negotiated and did not produce adequate morphosyntactic negotiations [15,16,26,33,43], SCMC has the potential for focus on both form and meaning, and especially phonetically modified output were most significant [14,21,22,31]. This suggests that grammatical triggers do provoke notice and possible negotiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, with regard to grammatical development, contrary to previous research which had stated that AudCMC dyads only managed to reach 45% of complete understanding of target lexicons being negotiated and did not produce adequate morphosyntactic negotiations [15,16,26,33,43], SCMC has the potential for focus on both form and meaning, and especially phonetically modified output were most significant [14,21,22,31]. This suggests that grammatical triggers do provoke notice and possible negotiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Results regarding learner proficiency diverge in different modalities of SCMC. Evidence supports that higher-span non-native speakers are most likely to solve syntactic ambiguities and notice recasts from their interlocutors [30,33,35]. However, discussion about indirect transfer of skills from written to oral mode lends itself to beneficial effects for lower PWMC learners [25,28,34].…”
Section: Cziko and Park (2003) [38]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, interaction in the CMC mode has been shown to differ from interaction in the face-to-face (FTF) mode, sometimes with better learning outcomes (Abrams, 2003;Böhkle, 2003;Kern, 1995;Lai & Zhao, 2006;Salaberry, 2000;Sullivan & Pratt, 1996;Sykes, 2005;Warschauer, 1996). More research is needed in this area.…”
Section: Theoretical Motivation For the Use Of Social Networking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%