The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics 2006
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511550751.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L2 acquisition and processing of Mandarin tones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angular gyrus also has been implicated in tasks involving semantic processing, word reading, number processing, and memory retrieval (see Seghier, 2013 for review), and is also a critical area related to lexical and conceptual processing (Binder & Desai, 2011;Mechelli et al, 2004;Price, 2010). Increased activation of bilateral pMTG/angular gyrus for our learners at T2 suggests that the learners are treating tonal information as lexical information that has semantic contents, consistent with previous findings with L2 learning of Chinese tones (Mei et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2003Wang et al, , 2006 and processing of tones in native speakers (Zhang et al, 2011). This pattern contrasts with the non-learners, who can only treat tonal information at an acoustic level and therefore showed more neural responses compared to the learners in left superior temporal gyrus (BA 22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Angular gyrus also has been implicated in tasks involving semantic processing, word reading, number processing, and memory retrieval (see Seghier, 2013 for review), and is also a critical area related to lexical and conceptual processing (Binder & Desai, 2011;Mechelli et al, 2004;Price, 2010). Increased activation of bilateral pMTG/angular gyrus for our learners at T2 suggests that the learners are treating tonal information as lexical information that has semantic contents, consistent with previous findings with L2 learning of Chinese tones (Mei et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2003Wang et al, , 2006 and processing of tones in native speakers (Zhang et al, 2011). This pattern contrasts with the non-learners, who can only treat tonal information at an acoustic level and therefore showed more neural responses compared to the learners in left superior temporal gyrus (BA 22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They additionally showed reduced responses in a few regions in the right hemisphere, including middle frontal gyrus (BA 46), insula, fusiform gyrus (BA 37), middle temporal gyrus (BA 21), inferior parietal lobe (BA 40), precuneus (BA 7), putamen, parahippocampal gyrus and cuneus. The reduced responses, especially in the left hemisphere, suggest that the learners are more efficient in processing the tones as linguistic units, consistent with neuroimaging work in prosodic learning and processing (see Wang et al, 2003;Wang, Sereno, & Jongman, 2006;Zhang et al, 2011). Third, in the onset discrimination task, the learners, as compared with the non-learners, showed more activation in the left posterior middle temporal gyrus/angular gyrus (BA 39), consistent with the roles of these structures in semantic processing (see further discussion below in Section 4).…”
Section: Sound Discrimination At T2: Participants (Learners Vs Non-lsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the posttests, in line with studies conducted by Miracle (1989), Sun (1998), Shen (1989, Wang et al (2003), and Wang, Sereno & Jongman (2006), problems with pitch height seemed to negatively impact pronunciation of Tones 0-4 more than pitch shape or contour. In general our findings from the auditory analysis confirm those of past research in that Tone 3 is highly problematic for L2 learners of Mandarin Chinese (Guo & Tao, 2008) and pitch height can be identified as the biggest obstacle in obtaining native like pronunciation of the 5 tones.…”
Section: Auditory Analysessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Linguistic experience influences not only non-native segmental but also suprasegmental perception (Francis, Ciocca, Ma, and Fenn, 2008;Gandour, 1983;Gandour, Wong, Lowe, Dzemidzic, Satthamnuwong, Tong, and Li, 2002;Gottfried and Suiter, 1997;Wang, Jongman, and Sereno, 2006;Wayland and Guion, 2004). Many of the world's languages, such as Mandarin, Cantonese, and Thai, use different pitch patterns (tones) systematically to differentiate words, and these tones are often the only element that can distinguish words from each other (Yip, 2002).…”
Section: A Effects Of Language Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%