1983
DOI: 10.1524/anly.1983.3.14.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L P ( ρ > 1)-APPROXIMATION BY KANTOROVICH POLYNOMIALS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which has been studied most widely among the positive linear operators of the form (2) (see [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]). Interested readers could also refer to the related papers for the other similar operators.…”
Section: Journal Of Function Spaces and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which has been studied most widely among the positive linear operators of the form (2) (see [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]). Interested readers could also refer to the related papers for the other similar operators.…”
Section: Journal Of Function Spaces and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) If q and 9 2 are two functions with the above properties, then Kçv2 implies K1w(f, with a K1 independent of f € B and ô > 0, (iv) If w(f, 5) o(b2) /or a sequence ô -0 then / is linear.…”
Section: K(t2/) < K 1w(f 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) There is a constant K for which w(f, ,ô) :5, K22w (5) is satisfied for all / € B, 2 > I and 6 > 0.…”
Section: K(t2/) < K 1w(f 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us compare the rate of approximation by Bernstein polynomials with the rate of approximation by Kantorovich polynomials K,f (See Section 2) and the best approximation of f in Lp[0, 1] by algebraic polynomials of nth degree E,(f) r As a consequence of Theorem 1, Corollary 4.1 in [6] and Totik's results in [14] (see also Lemmas 7 and 8 below) we have When a <-I/p, statements (b) and (c) in Corollary 2 are also equivalent [15, p. 239], but we cannot expect an equivalence of (a) and (b) for each a < 1 because of the discrete nature of Bernstein polynomials.…”
Section: Theorem a Let 1 < P < ~ And Let F Be Bounded And Measurablementioning
confidence: 99%