2014
DOI: 10.3917/rdli.080.0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'incitation à négocier en faveur de l'emploi des seniors. Un instrument efficace ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, throughout these reforms, the idea has emerged that some compensation mechanisms should be introduced for those who had experienced hard working conditions or started to work early (Caser and Jolivet 2014). This idea was strongly supported by the trade unions and was a topic of social dialogue between 2003 and 2017.…”
Section: Older Workers' Employment: From Social Consensus Around Earlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, throughout these reforms, the idea has emerged that some compensation mechanisms should be introduced for those who had experienced hard working conditions or started to work early (Caser and Jolivet 2014). This idea was strongly supported by the trade unions and was a topic of social dialogue between 2003 and 2017.…”
Section: Older Workers' Employment: From Social Consensus Around Earlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shift in state strategy is not unique to WFB. If public regulation remains a dominant feature of the French context, the state favours recourse to a collective bargaining process in order to change employer practices (Caser and Jolivet, 2014). This strategy of 'negotiated public action' (Groux, 2001) has been deployed since the 1982 Auroux Laws.…”
Section: Recent Developments In the French Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this legal mechanism, which invites social partners to the negotiating table and prescribes the menu, allows for diverse logics of implementation. First, by incorporating the WFB issue into the list of themes to be treated during mandatory collective bargaining on gender equality, it engenders a silo approach in which each theme is isolated rather than an approach favouring global reflection on the issues at stake (Caser and Jolivet, 2014). WFB is therefore rarely linked to gender equality in such agreements.…”
Section: Opportunity Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%