2006
DOI: 10.3917/dbu.haech.2006.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'école à l'épreuve de la sociologie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To get around the effects of massification (Dubet, 1992) subsequent to middle- and lower-class access to secondary education, the middle-class parents who benefited the most from the democratization of the education system (Derouet, 2000b) now try to avoid poorly ranked institutions and register their children at schools that meet their requirements for instruction and socialization (Broccolichi, 1997; Broccolichi and Van Zanten, 1997). Such avoidance practices result in a differentiation of schools according to the makeup of the student body and pedagogical practices, concentrating “gifted” students in schools with academic and social selection practices (Dumay et al, 2011; Felouzis et al, 2013; Maroy, 2006; Van Zanten, 1996), while students with difficulties or who exhibit behaviors unsuited to school are sent to relegation schools, cynically labelled “trash schools” (Van Haecht, 1998: 191). More broadly speaking, these changes, which we can assume are part of New Public Management’s extension into education, including the education systems of North American societies, have a very substantial deprofessionalization impact on teachers (Lessard, 2002, 2004; Normand, 2011; Tardif and LeVasseur, 2010).…”
Section: Decentralization and The Bifurcation Of The Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get around the effects of massification (Dubet, 1992) subsequent to middle- and lower-class access to secondary education, the middle-class parents who benefited the most from the democratization of the education system (Derouet, 2000b) now try to avoid poorly ranked institutions and register their children at schools that meet their requirements for instruction and socialization (Broccolichi, 1997; Broccolichi and Van Zanten, 1997). Such avoidance practices result in a differentiation of schools according to the makeup of the student body and pedagogical practices, concentrating “gifted” students in schools with academic and social selection practices (Dumay et al, 2011; Felouzis et al, 2013; Maroy, 2006; Van Zanten, 1996), while students with difficulties or who exhibit behaviors unsuited to school are sent to relegation schools, cynically labelled “trash schools” (Van Haecht, 1998: 191). More broadly speaking, these changes, which we can assume are part of New Public Management’s extension into education, including the education systems of North American societies, have a very substantial deprofessionalization impact on teachers (Lessard, 2002, 2004; Normand, 2011; Tardif and LeVasseur, 2010).…”
Section: Decentralization and The Bifurcation Of The Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une deuxième période s'est ouverte, marquée par un paradoxe. Un véritable milieu scientifique a émergé qui traitait de l'ensemble des questions d'éducation, selon des approches théoriques et méthodologiques variées ; les productions ont atteint une certaine masse critique, le milieu a commencé à se structurer avec des colloques réguliers et une revue (Van Haecht 1990). En même temps qu'il atteignait une certaine maturité, le secteur passait du centre à la périphérie de la discipline et les publi-…”
Section: Faire Valoir Les Productions De La Sociologie De Langue Fran...unclassified
“…Para contornar os efeitos da massificação (Dubet, 1992), os pais de classe média, que mais se beneficiaram com a democratização do sistema de ensino, buscam agora evitar os estabelecimentos malconceituados e matricular seus filhos em estabelecimentos que mantêm suas exigências em matéria de instrução e de socialização (Broccolichi, 1997). Essas práticas de evitação têm por efeito final diferenciar os estabelecimentos quanto à composição dos alunos e às práticas pedagógicas, e concentrar os alunos "dotados" em estabelecimentos que se distinguem por políticas de seleção acadêmica e social (Van Zanten, 1996) e os alunos com dificuldades ou com comportamento a-escolar em estabelecimentos de relegação chamados de "lixos" (Van Haecht, 1998). A emergência de um modelo comercial gera novas formas de segregação e leva à dualização do sistema educativo entre uma rede de desempenho e uma rede de relegação centrada na luta contra a exclusão social, o que coloca em xeque a idéia de igualdade de chances na educação e constitui assim uma mancha na representação moderna da escola como instrumento de democratização.…”
Section: O Crescimento Do Modelo Comercial Na Educaçãounclassified