2012
DOI: 10.7202/1011705ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L’apolitisme municipal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation may have to do with context. There were some specific trends in larger municipalities in the 2009 Quebec elections such as (1) strong apoliticism, (2) reluctance to integrate political parties in some big cities; (3) acclamations; and (4) a trend toward the personalization of power (Bherer and Breux, 2012). These contextual elements invite us to consider the specificity of the municipal scene, specifically that small and large municipalities are not alike.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation may have to do with context. There were some specific trends in larger municipalities in the 2009 Quebec elections such as (1) strong apoliticism, (2) reluctance to integrate political parties in some big cities; (3) acclamations; and (4) a trend toward the personalization of power (Bherer and Breux, 2012). These contextual elements invite us to consider the specificity of the municipal scene, specifically that small and large municipalities are not alike.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the duration of these groups is generally short and mainly linked to the victory of the leader. Finally, the internal organization of these groups is poorly structured and partisan life is absent (Bherer and Breux, 2012). The Projet Montréal party, however, does not fit this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%