2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2012-05511-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$L^{2}$ Serre duality on domains in complex manifolds and applications

Abstract: An L 2 version of the Serre duality on domains in complex manifolds involving duality of Hilbert space realizations of the ∂-operator is established. This duality is used to study the solution of the ∂-equation with prescribed support. Applications are given to ∂-closed extension of forms, as well to Bochner-Hartogs type extension of CR functions.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 32C37, 35N15, 32W05.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalence between (i) and (ii) is a direct consequence of the Serre duality (see [4] or Theorem 2.2). From Proposition 4.7 in [20], we know that H n,n c,L 2 (X \ D) is Hausdorff if and only if H n,n−1 W 1 (D) = 0.…”
Section: H(q)mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equivalence between (i) and (ii) is a direct consequence of the Serre duality (see [4] or Theorem 2.2). From Proposition 4.7 in [20], we know that H n,n c,L 2 (X \ D) is Hausdorff if and only if H n,n−1 W 1 (D) = 0.…”
Section: H(q)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The necessary condition is a direct consequence of Corollary 3.14 and Theorem 3.13. The sufficient condition follows from Theorem 5 in [4].…”
Section: H(q)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space L 2 (D) being an Hilbert space is self-dual and moreover the weak maximal realization of a differential operator and its strong minimal realization are dual to each other (see [2]). …”
Section: Dual Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corollary 3.2 implies that H 2 n,n−q (Ω, e −ψ+δφ , ω) and H 2 n,n−q+1 (Ω, e −ψ+δφ , ω) are {0}. Therefore, the Serre duality in [4] implies that ∂ : L 2 0,q−1 (Ω, e ψ−δφ , ω) → L 2 0,q (Ω, e ψ−δφ , ω) has a closed range and For the convenience of readers, we repeat Lemma 5 in [9]. Let Ω be a smoothly bounded pseudoconvex domain in C n with a plurisubharmonic defining function ϕ ∈ C ∞ (Ω), i.e.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 96%