2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-017-1863-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing pseudoconvexity in Lipschitz domains with holes via $${\bar{\partial }}$$ ∂ ¯

Abstract: Let Ω = Ω \ D where Ω is a bounded domain with connected complement in C n (or more generally in a Stein manifold) and D is relatively compact open subset of Ω with connected complement in Ω. We obtain characterizations of pseudoconvexity of Ω and D through the vanishing or Hausdorff property of the Dolbeault cohomology groups on various function spaces. In particular, we show that if the boundaries of Ω and D are Lipschitz and C 2 -smooth respectively, then both Ω and D are pseudoconvex if and only if 0 is no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we construct a long exact sequence associated to an annulus which relates the function theory of the annulus with that of its hole and its envelope. An immediate consequence of our result is Corollary 1.2 of the introduction, and in particular the very important exact sequence (1.7), which encompasses many of the results about L 2 -estimates on annuli as found in [LS13,FLTS17] and earlier works cited there.…”
Section: 21supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Now we construct a long exact sequence associated to an annulus which relates the function theory of the annulus with that of its hole and its envelope. An immediate consequence of our result is Corollary 1.2 of the introduction, and in particular the very important exact sequence (1.7), which encompasses many of the results about L 2 -estimates on annuli as found in [LS13,FLTS17] and earlier works cited there.…”
Section: 21supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Following the arguments in the proof of Lemma 1.7, we can prove that if Ȟn,q Φ (X \ D) = 0 for all ≤ q ≤ n − 1, then Ȟn,q (X \ D) = 0, for any 1 ≤ q ≤ n − 2 and Ȟn,n−1 (X\D) = 0 is Hausdorff. Moreover, Theorem 3.11 in [5] implies that H n,q D,cur (X) = 0 if and only if Ȟn,q−1 (X \ D) = 0, for any 1 ≤ q ≤ n − 1. Proposition 3.7 in [5] implies that if Ȟn,n−1 (X \ D) = 0, then H n,n D,cur (X) is Hausdorff.…”
Section: Some New Runge Density Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Theorem 3.11 in [5] implies that H n,q D,cur (X) = 0 if and only if Ȟn,q−1 (X \ D) = 0, for any 1 ≤ q ≤ n − 1. Proposition 3.7 in [5] implies that if Ȟn,n−1 (X \ D) = 0, then H n,n D,cur (X) is Hausdorff. Therefore the corollary follows from Corollary 3.12, Theorem 3.13 in [5] and Corollary 2.5.…”
Section: Some New Runge Density Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral behavior of the ∂-Neumann Laplacian has also been shown to be sensitive to the geometry of the domains. Positivity of the ∂-Neumann can be used to characterize pseudoconvexity (see [17,22] and references therein). Spectral discreteness of the ∂-Neumann Laplacian can be used to determine whether the boundary of a convex domain in C n contains a complex variety ( [19,20]) and whether the boundary of a smooth bounded pseudoconvex Hartogs domain in C 2 satisfies property (P), a potential theoretic property introduced by Catlin [5] (see [9,21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%