1999
DOI: 10.1177/016224399902400102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kuhn in the Classroom, Lakatos in the Lab: Science Educators Confront the Nature-of-Science Debate

Abstract: Programs for the reform of K-12 science teaching today usually insist that science teachers must introduce their students to the nature of science, as well as to scientific content. The academic field of science studies, however, evinces no consensus about what the nature of science really is. This article examines how science educators and educational researchers have drawn on the fragmented teachings of science studies about the nature of science, and how they have used those teachings as a resource in their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, standard practices of teaching philosophy of science have been criticized as inadequate (Moore et al 2002;Alters and Nelson 2002) as they can fail to provide learners with an adequate organizational framework for understanding evolution (Turner and Sullenger 1999). Put simply, to understand basic principles in science and to overcome common misconceptions, one must possess sound scientific schema from which to confront existing cognitive biases and to integrate and accurately reproduce scientific knowledge.…”
Section: Implications For Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, standard practices of teaching philosophy of science have been criticized as inadequate (Moore et al 2002;Alters and Nelson 2002) as they can fail to provide learners with an adequate organizational framework for understanding evolution (Turner and Sullenger 1999). Put simply, to understand basic principles in science and to overcome common misconceptions, one must possess sound scientific schema from which to confront existing cognitive biases and to integrate and accurately reproduce scientific knowledge.…”
Section: Implications For Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our previous collaborations, we were well aware of these questions, of the disengagement problem in general, and of the challenges that face the design of informal science education programs (e.g., Turner & Sullenger, 1999). With the launch of CRYSTAL Atlantique, one of us (Sullenger) set out to implement a program of informal science education in the province of New Brunswick that would address the problem and test our conceptions of how such a program should be designed.…”
Section: Science In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flera forskare (Akerson, Abd-El-Khalick, & Lederman, 2000;Bybee et al, 2008;Duschl & Wright, 1989;Eick, 2000;Keys & Bryan, 2001;Matson & Parsons, 2002;Moscovici, 1999;Rosenthal, 1993;Turner & Sullenger, 1999) har funnit att lärare har bristande kunskaper och erfarenheter om hur naturvetenskaplig kunskap skapas. De menar att detta sätter gränser för deras förmåga att planera och genomföra lektioner för att hjälpa elever att utveckla en bild av na-40 turvetenskapen som sträcker sig utanför ramarna för den välbekanta faktakunskapen.…”
Section: Nos-kunskaper För Inquiry-undervisningunclassified