1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-4408.1985.tb03737.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kubelka—Munk Theory and the Prediction of Reflectance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
142
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
142
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the dark site as a black paint that is completely absorbing the incident radiation penetrating the interface (R b P = 0), a good estimation of R b V can be obtained by R black UC (λ ) [25], while R i P is estimated by R black C (λ ) (see Eq. (1)).…”
Section: Measurement/estimation Of the Parameters Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the dark site as a black paint that is completely absorbing the incident radiation penetrating the interface (R b P = 0), a good estimation of R b V can be obtained by R black UC (λ ) [25], while R i P is estimated by R black C (λ ) (see Eq. (1)).…”
Section: Measurement/estimation Of the Parameters Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, anisotropy of the propagating fluxes is a main concern of the Kubelka-Munk theory. Nobbs [87] …”
Section: Saunderson Correction In Transmittance Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been shown that these parameters are actually interdependent. 11,12 Before considering the issue of the interdependence of the K and S coefficients and its impact on the prediction of reflectance spectra, let us review the actual equations 10 allowing one to compute a sample reflectance R and transmittance T for each wavelength separately,…”
Section: Fundamentals Of the Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%