2012
DOI: 10.5644/godisnjak.cbi.anubih-40.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kritike i prikazi / Besprehungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This meant that the collective names from ancient accounts were understood as objective indices of stable and normatively defined ethnic tribal identities, with their respective territories, histories and distinguishable cultures that had their specific material manifestations. Within such epistemic constellation, the historical reconstruction of Papazoglu (1969Papazoglu ( , 1978 was decisive, as it played the role of the pervasive interpretational fabric, while archaeological evidence was conformed to the historiographic narratives of the Central Balkan 'tribes' (see Džino 2011;Mihajlović 2014aMihajlović , 2019. In effect, the late Iron Age archaeology ascribed meaning to its data almost exclusively by referring to reconstructed 'tribal' histories, thus drastically limiting the range of research questions and problems it tried to solve.…”
Section: Archaeological Interpretations Of Pre-roman Slaverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meant that the collective names from ancient accounts were understood as objective indices of stable and normatively defined ethnic tribal identities, with their respective territories, histories and distinguishable cultures that had their specific material manifestations. Within such epistemic constellation, the historical reconstruction of Papazoglu (1969Papazoglu ( , 1978 was decisive, as it played the role of the pervasive interpretational fabric, while archaeological evidence was conformed to the historiographic narratives of the Central Balkan 'tribes' (see Džino 2011;Mihajlović 2014aMihajlović , 2019. In effect, the late Iron Age archaeology ascribed meaning to its data almost exclusively by referring to reconstructed 'tribal' histories, thus drastically limiting the range of research questions and problems it tried to solve.…”
Section: Archaeological Interpretations Of Pre-roman Slaverymentioning
confidence: 99%