Kontribusi Peradilan Adat Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia

Rochaeti, Nur; Sutanti, Rahmi Dwi

doi:10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with Article 18B of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power which recognizes the existence of indigenous peoples, as well as customary justice institutions as long as they do not conflict with the 1945 Constitution. 10 Customary justice is a judicial institution that lives according to local customs. 11 Customary courts in the kanayat'n Dayak community are led by customary heads and customary elders or customary law authorities.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restorative Justice Paradigm of Kanayat'n Dayak Customary Law on Environmental Damage Caused By Shifting Cultivation

Dawi

Haryono

Yuliastini

et al. 2022

JAH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The culture of farming and clearing land has existed since the transition of primitive humans to the modern age, as has the agricultural culture of the Dayak Kanayat’n indigenous people, which has been handed down from their predecessors for generations is currently evolving. The Kanayat’n Dayak are a sub-tribe of the Dayak who reside primarily in West Kalimantan on the island of Kalimantan. The Dayak Kanayat’n indigenous people are predominantly traditional farmers using traditional farming techniques. Agriculture is a part of the culture; agricultural techniques give rise to a farming culture, which absorbs local practices in cultivating the land. The pattern of land clearing can deduce the traditional nature of this agriculture. Conventional Dayak kanayat’n farmers clear the ground by identifying the area, chopping down the vegetation, and burning the remnants. This method of land clearance employed by the indigenous Dayak Kanyat‘n is also known as shifting cropping. This shifting cultivation activity has a positive aspect, namely the development and preservation of traditional Dayak kanayat’n agricultural culture customs. Still, it also has a wrong side, environmental damage, if carried out in large quantities and without measurement. This research focuses on the sociological juridical approach. Methods of data collection employing both primary and secondary legal materials. Article 80 of the Provisions for the Traditional Deliberation in Sengah Temila District, dated March 12-13, 2010, stipulates the administration of restorative justice to farmers who violate Dayak Kanayat customary law and cause forest fires. The sanction is Siam Pahar Pangalabur Temenggung.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restorative Justice Paradigm of Kanayat'n Dayak Customary Law on Environmental Damage Caused By Shifting Cultivation

Dawi

Haryono

Yuliastini

et al. 2022

JAH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the State Courts have obtained legitimacy to settle existing legal cases, customary courts are often used in resolving cases in certain indigenous peoples, especially in this case, the Dayak indigenous people. One of the procedures for resolving criminal cases is penal mediation that promotes restorative justice through an agreement between the parties with traditional characteristics of law, cultural pluralism, moral values, and religion [5]. In Central Kalimantan, customary courts play an important role in creating harmony between Dayak tribes.…”

Section: Position Of Dayak Customary Judiciarymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Existence of Dayak Customary Council in Settlement of Criminal Cases Based on Local Awareness (Decision Study of Dayak Customary Council Section No. 01/SMAD-PA/I/2011)

Pujirahayu¹,

Wulandari²

2021

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Economic, Governance, ICOLEG 2021, 29-30 June 2021, Semarang, Indonesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the Dayak Customary Council's existence in the resolution of criminal cases based on local wisdom (Study of Dayak Traditional Council Session Decision No. 01/SMAD-PA/I/2011) by describing the position of the Dayak customary court and analysis of the MADN decision against the Thamrin customary violators. The existence of indigenous peoples with their traditional rights has received constitutional recognition in Indonesia. Although customary courts' existence is gradually being eliminated due to the unification of law in Indonesia, in practice, several criminal cases are resolved through customary institutions. Settlement of criminal cases through customary institutions is considered more in accordance with existing local wisdom and can realize the values of justice desired by the parties in the case and restore the balance of the cosmos. One of them is the Dayak Customary Council's role, which passed Decision No. 01/SMAD-PA/I/2011 by basing the customary trial on the 1894 Tumbang Anoi Peace Agreement. Dayak Customary Institutions get legitimacy through the Regional Regulation of Palangka Raya City, which regulates Dayak Customary Institutions. Recognition of indigenous peoples' traditional rights can certainly not be separated from the customary laws that apply in the community and become the basis for the settlement of cases through customary institutions that exist as long as they have not been accommodated in state courts. Therefore, it is necessary to have synchronization, codification of recognition, and enforcement of customary law, which is still firmly adhered to by indigenous peoples in resolving criminal cases. It is done to restore further the cosmic balance (fulfilling justice between the parties in the case, the community, and the surrounding environment).

show abstract

“…Hal ini tampak sejalan dengan filosofi pendekatan keadilan restoratif yang menurut Strang dan Braithwaite, secara filosofis didasarkan pada prinsip healing and respectful dialogue, forgiveness, responsibility, apology and making amends (terjemahan: pemulihan dan dialog yang dibangun dengan saling menghormati antara para pihak, pengampunan, tanggung jawab, memberi maaf dan memperbaiki kesalahan) (Sarwirini, 2014). Tampaknya apa yang dikatakan Marc Levin bahwa pendekatan yang dulu dinyatakan sudah usang, kuno dan tradisional kini justru dinyatakan sebagai pendekatan yang progresif (Rochaeti & Sutanti, 2018), benar-benar terjadi. Meskipun pendekatan keadilan restoratif menjadi dikotomi dari pendekatan keadilan retributif, yang dianut secara konvensional oleh sistem peradilan pidana yang selalu memberikan sanksi pidana, sebagaimana disampaikan Chris Cunnen, "The retributive/restorative justice dichotomy fast became in the standard (opposition) approach used to define restorative justice.…”

Section: Keadilan Restoratif Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana DI Indonesiaunclassified

Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan

Setyowati

2020

pandecta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Memahami kembali konsep restorative justice atau keadilan restoratif sebagai upaya sistem peradilan pidana dalam menggapai keadilan adalah penting. Hal ini disebabkan sistem peradilan pidana konvensional sebagian besar berfokus pada penerapan hukum, menilai kesalahan dan memberikan hukuman. Sebaliknya, keadilan restoratif adalah pendekatan terhadap kejahatan yang berfokus pada upaya untuk memperbaiki kerusakan yang terjadi dengan melibatkan mereka yang telah terkena dampak. Memahami kejahatan tidak hanya sebagai pelanggaran hukum yang membutuhkan kecaman publik, tetapi juga sebagai cedera pada orang-orang yang terlibat dan hubungan yang membutuhkan penyembuhan. Mereka jangan dibiarkan dengan berbagai kebutuhan fisik, emosional, psikologis, spiritual dan material nya, dan apa yang disebut 'kebutuhan keadilan' ini harus diatasi jika mereka ingin merasa bahwa keadilan telah diupayakan.. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami kembali konsep restorative justice atau keadilan restoratif sebagai upaya sistem peradilan pidana dalam menggapai keadilan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual, sejarah serta peraturan perundang-undangan. Dari penelitian ini dapat diketahui bahwa keadilan restoratifyang mengacu pada cara menanggapi kejahatan, atau jenis kesalahan lainnya, ketidakadilan atau konflik, yang berfokus terutama pada perbaikan kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh tindakan yang salah dan memulihkan sejauh mungkin, kesejahteraan semua pihak yang terlibat. Ini mencerminkan teori keadilan yang lebih relasional karena menekankan pemulihan rasa hormat, kesetaraan, dan martabat terhadap hubungan yang dipengaruhi oleh kesalahan.Understanding the concept of restorative justice as an effort of the criminal justice system in achieving justice is important. This is due to the fact that the conventional criminal justice system focuses mostly on the application of the law, evaluating errors and providing penalties. In contrast, restorative justice is an approach to crime that focuses on efforts to repair the damage done by involving those who have been affected. Understanding crime is not only a violation of the law that requires public condemnation, but also as an injury to the people involved and relationships that need healing. They should not be left with various physical, emotional, psychological, spiritual and material needs, and so-called 'justice needs' must be addressed if they want to feel that justice has been pursued. This research aims to re-understand the concept of restorative justice or restorative justice as an effort of the criminal justice system in achieving justice. This research is a legal study using a conceptual, historical and statutory approach. From this research it can be seen that restorative justice refers to how to respond to crime, or other types of mistakes, injustices or conflicts, which focus primarily on repairing the damage caused by wrong actions and restoring as far as possible, the welfare of all parties involved. This reflects a more relational theory of justice because it emphasizes restoring respect, equality, and dignity for relationships that are affected by mistakes.

show abstract

Kontribusi Peradilan Adat Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Restorative Justice Paradigm of Kanayat'n Dayak Customary Law on Environmental Damage Caused By Shifting Cultivation

Restorative Justice Paradigm of Kanayat'n Dayak Customary Law on Environmental Damage Caused By Shifting Cultivation

The Existence of Dayak Customary Council in Settlement of Criminal Cases Based on Local Awareness (Decision Study of Dayak Customary Council Section No. 01/SMAD-PA/I/2011)

Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About