2011
DOI: 10.1515/zfsoz-2011-0505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Können Examensnoten verglichen werden? Eine Analyse von Einflüssen des sozialen Kontextes auf Hochschulprüfungen / Are Grades in Exams Comparable to Each Other? The Impact of Social Context on Grading in Higher Education

Abstract: Zusammenfassung: Examensnoten wären als Indikatoren für die individuelle Lernleistung oder die Lehrleistung einer Hochschule wertlos, wenn sie systematisch durch andere Einflüsse verzerrt würden. In diesem Beitrag werden auf der Grundlage von Daten aus der Hochschulstatistik einige systematische Notenunterschiede an deutschen Hochschulen nachgewiesen, sowohl in Bezug auf verschiedene Aggregationsniveaus und soziale Kontexte als auch im zeitlichen Verlauf der letzten 15 Jahre und über diese hinaus. Dazu werden … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they noted that non-traditional students had lower course completion rates at the beginning of their studies, less frequently obtained a degree, and, when they did, received worse grades than traditional students did (Brändle & Lengfeld, 2015). Altogether, findings regarding the study performance of nontraditional students are far from consistent -the reasons being insufficient comparability of samples and discipline-specific grading cultures (Müller-Benedict & Tsarouha, 2011).…”
Section: Study Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they noted that non-traditional students had lower course completion rates at the beginning of their studies, less frequently obtained a degree, and, when they did, received worse grades than traditional students did (Brändle & Lengfeld, 2015). Altogether, findings regarding the study performance of nontraditional students are far from consistent -the reasons being insufficient comparability of samples and discipline-specific grading cultures (Müller-Benedict & Tsarouha, 2011).…”
Section: Study Performancementioning
confidence: 99%