Komparasi Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Metode Teams-Games Tournament Dan Team-Assisted Individualization Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Ajar Tata Nama Senyawa Kelas X Sma Negeri 12 Banjarmasin

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMA Negeri 12 Banjarmasin dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya perbedaan hasil belajar menggunakan metode TGT (Teams Games Tournament) dan metode TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) pada materi tata nama senyawa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi-experimental research). Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X MIA di SMA Negeri 12 Banjarmasin yang terdiri dari 3 kelas yaitu kelas X MIA 1, X MIA 2, dan X MIA 3. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas X MIA 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas X MIA 3 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes. Dari hasil analisis data dengan uji -t diperoleh nilai thitung (2,999) > ttabel (1,683), yang berarti terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar menggunakan metode TGT dan metode TAI pada materi ajar tata nama senyawa, dimana rata-rata nilai hasil belajar kelas yang menggunakan metode TAI sebesar79,62 lebih tinggi daripada kelas metode TGT sebesar 72,45. Untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia siswa, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan metode TGT dan TAI dapat menjadi bahan pertimbangan oleh guru-guru kimia sebagai variasi dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran kimia.This research was done in SMA Negeri 12 Banjarmasin by aiming to know if there was a difference between learning outcomes by using TGT (Teams- Games Tournament) and TAI (Team-Assisted Individualization) method on compounds nomenclature topic. It was a quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class X MIA in SMA Negeri 1 Banjarmasin consisting of 3 classes, namely class X MIA 1, X MIA 2, and X MIA 3. The samples in this study were class X MIA 2 as the experimental class 1 and class X MIA 3 as the experimental class 2. The data technique used in this study was a test. From the results of data analysis with t-test obtained tcount (2.999) > ttable (1.683), which meant that there was difference in learning outcomes using the TGT and TAI methods on compound nomenclature, where the average learning outcomes of the TAI class was 79.62 which was higher than the TGT class, 72.45. In order to improve student learning outcomes, learning using TGT and TAI methods can be taken into consideration by chemistry teachers as variations in learning.

Pedagogical Skills Exercise as an Alternative to Increase The Teaching Ability of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers at Field Experience Practice

“…Chemistry as one of the science subject at school requires approaches, techniques, strategies, and learning models that are specified by the characteristics of chemistry itself [8][9][10] [11][12] [13][14] [15][16] [17] [18][19] [20] [21] [22][23] [24] [25]. Mastery of the characteristics of the field of chemistry can only apply to chemistry teachers with sufficiently high teaching hours.…”

“…Many researchers try to maximize the learning of chemistry from various aspects. Some researchers look at the material aspect [8] [9][10] [11] [12][14] [16][17 [18][19] [20][21] [22][24] [ 25], some of them try to use a variety of models in learning [10] [11][13] [14][15] [23], others use media and various games to improve the chemistry learning process [8][9] [12][14] [16][17][18][19] [20][22][24] [25] and some try to bring chemistry closer to the culture and everyday life of students [21]. This shows that chemistry as a subject has distinctive and unique characteristics compared to other subjects.…”