2001
DOI: 10.1177/016224390102600102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Knowledge Value Alliances”: An Alternative to the R&D Project Focus in Evaluation

Abstract: The question of what the relevant entities or units of analysis for studying the dynamics of R&D are is central not only for adequate characterizations of the system of scientific and technological knowledge production but also for determining the correct focus for evaluation of R&D activities. Typically, R&D performance evaluations have focused not only on the wrong thing but have looked in the wrong place. Most evaluations have been project or program based. Often this focus is misleading. This a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I use this approach because it provides an analytically useful way of summarizing the data. Nonetheless, as Bozeman has noted, "the production of scientific knowledge is by definition social, many of the skills are more social or political than cognitive" thus acknowledging that for any inventor, their human and social (local and cosmopolitan) capital are highly interdependent (Bozeman et al, 1999, p. 18;Rogers and Bozeman, 2001). Likewise if we reevaluate Merton's explanation for the Matthew effect in science, we find that human capital (the quality of particular ideas) is intimately connected to affiliations and positions early on in the career of scientists (Merton, 1973).…”
Section: Theme and Variations-three Dimensions Of Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I use this approach because it provides an analytically useful way of summarizing the data. Nonetheless, as Bozeman has noted, "the production of scientific knowledge is by definition social, many of the skills are more social or political than cognitive" thus acknowledging that for any inventor, their human and social (local and cosmopolitan) capital are highly interdependent (Bozeman et al, 1999, p. 18;Rogers and Bozeman, 2001). Likewise if we reevaluate Merton's explanation for the Matthew effect in science, we find that human capital (the quality of particular ideas) is intimately connected to affiliations and positions early on in the career of scientists (Merton, 1973).…”
Section: Theme and Variations-three Dimensions Of Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such concepts are: 'knowledge value mapping', focusing on the collective relationships among knowledge producers and users; 'knowledge value collectives / alliances', i.e. a set of individuals connected by their uses of information for the creation of knowledge (Rogers and Bozeman, 2001); and 'technoeconomic networks' (Callon, et. al.…”
Section: Results and Policy Impact/implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These network organizations often lack a strict hierarchy and a clear task division (Rogers and Bozeman 2001 ;Saari and Miettinen 2001 ). R&D covers a broad range of activities, and involves many different actors and institutions, working together in complex cooperative ventures (network organizations).…”
Section: Identifying Ethical Issues: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%