2016
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Sharing on Enterprise Social Media: Practices to Cope With Institutional Complexity

Abstract: This study examines the use of enterprise social media (ESM) for organizational knowledge sharing and shows that professionals face ambiguities because their knowledge sharing behavior is informed by an institutional complexity that consists of 2 dissimilar institutional logics: logics of the profession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(92 reference statements)
7
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Gaver (); see also McGrenere & Ho, ) distinguished between information in the affordance itself (usefulness), and mediating information about the affordances (usability, such as labels; implementer or other user suggestions; the context), giving rise to four kinds of affordances: correct rejections, perceptible, hidden, and false affordances. Further, the same object may offer different affordances to different contexts and actor groups (Faraj & Azad, ; Oliver, ; Oostervink, Agterberg, & Huysman, ). An affordance can have both positive and negative, intended and unintended, and short‐ and long‐term connotations; it may both enable and constrain action (Conole & Dyke, ; Majchrzak, Faraj, Kane, & Azad, ; Oostervink et al, ).…”
Section: Problem Statement Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Gaver (); see also McGrenere & Ho, ) distinguished between information in the affordance itself (usefulness), and mediating information about the affordances (usability, such as labels; implementer or other user suggestions; the context), giving rise to four kinds of affordances: correct rejections, perceptible, hidden, and false affordances. Further, the same object may offer different affordances to different contexts and actor groups (Faraj & Azad, ; Oliver, ; Oostervink, Agterberg, & Huysman, ). An affordance can have both positive and negative, intended and unintended, and short‐ and long‐term connotations; it may both enable and constrain action (Conole & Dyke, ; Majchrzak, Faraj, Kane, & Azad, ; Oostervink et al, ).…”
Section: Problem Statement Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the same object may offer different affordances to different contexts and actor groups (Faraj & Azad, ; Oliver, ; Oostervink, Agterberg, & Huysman, ). An affordance can have both positive and negative, intended and unintended, and short‐ and long‐term connotations; it may both enable and constrain action (Conole & Dyke, ; Majchrzak, Faraj, Kane, & Azad, ; Oostervink et al, ). Affordances may be nested, temporally or spatially interdependent, and bundled into sets of interrelating affordances and outcomes (Strong et al, ).…”
Section: Problem Statement Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies include the overload effects among the main barriers that can hinder the effective adoption and use of SM in business (Oostervink, Agterberg, & Huysman, ; Razmerita, Kirchner, & Nielsen, ; van Osch, Steinfield, & Balogh, ), but research on this topic is still scarce. There are studies about the information overload effect in public SM, such as, for example, Facebook (Bright, Kleiser, & Grau, ; Maier et al, ), but their findings are not directly transferable to the case of companies, where SM are mainly employed for business goals and not for entertainment or just social reasons.…”
Section: Cognitive Overloadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their case study of a large multinational organisation, Huang et al (2015) identified tensions between formal systems containing central, organisationally produced content, and decentralised social media, consisting of user-generated content. In addition, Oostervink, Agterberg, and Huysman (2016) observed how the openness of social media caused ambiguity in how to use the available communication systems. They found that employees were torn between the logic of the corporation (usage of social media to improve productivity and efficiency) and the logic of the profession (learning from peers and developing expertise).…”
Section: Ecological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%