2005
DOI: 10.3138/gh27-1847-qp71-7tp7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Production through Critical GIS: Genealogy and Prospects

Abstract: Over the last decade, a new research program has emerged at the interface between geographic information science and geographical social theory, now called critical GIS. I analyze the emergence of critical GIS as an example of knowledge production in Geography. I examine its genealogy, highlighting the key debates, events and individuals instrumental in facilitating a rapprochement between two initially opposed scholarly communities, and tracing the directions that this has since taken. Addressing its current … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
117
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybridized geographic/cartographic approaches have been vital in framing and theorizing the societal challenges related to emerging map practices and technologies (Leszczynski & Wilson, 2013;Ricker et al, 2014). Furthermore, critical geographic perspectives have identified historical limitations of user studies in cartography and are also shaping new ways for conducting such research (D'Ignazio & Klein, 2016;Elwood, 2010;Sheppard, 2005), including the UCD studies discussed below (Sack, 2013). Opportunities for hybridization continue to present themselves as geography and cartography further converge at the site of the mobile map.…”
Section: Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridized geographic/cartographic approaches have been vital in framing and theorizing the societal challenges related to emerging map practices and technologies (Leszczynski & Wilson, 2013;Ricker et al, 2014). Furthermore, critical geographic perspectives have identified historical limitations of user studies in cartography and are also shaping new ways for conducting such research (D'Ignazio & Klein, 2016;Elwood, 2010;Sheppard, 2005), including the UCD studies discussed below (Sack, 2013). Opportunities for hybridization continue to present themselves as geography and cartography further converge at the site of the mobile map.…”
Section: Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we note that most of the research concerning the use of GIS to support decision-making has been about GIS development rather than about GIS use, 'without a strong theoretical link between the two' (Jankowski and Nyerges , 2001, p. 263). An exception might be the niche in cartography where the social constructivist approach to mapping, also called critical GIS, seems a recurring theme since Harley's "Deconstructing the Map" (Harley, 1989a and1989b;Pickles, 1995;Harvey, 2000;Brown and Laurier, 2005;Sheppard, 2005;Harvey et al, 2005;Chrisman, 2005;Schuurman, 2005;Duncan and Lach, 2006;Crumplin, 2007). But in our view, this area seems to be more dedicated to the production of map-and GIS information in the social environment of the 'GIS-room' than about the use of it for regional policymaking and planning.…”
Section: Introduction: Maps Source Of Conflict In Collaborative Policmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It follows Newton who views spatiality as absolute conceptualizations, representing space as independent spatial features (e.g., discrete vector features or raster cells), rather than Einstein and Leibnitz who view space as relational [31]. Therefore, traditional GIS has often been criticized for its inadequacy in representing relational spaces of social power and subjective differences among its analyzed objects [26,32].…”
Section: Vgi For Satisfying the Information Diversity Requirement Of Ipmmentioning
confidence: 99%