Knowledge mobilization in the context of health technology assessment: an exploratory case study

Abstract

BackgroundFinding measures to enhance the dissemination and implementation of their recommendations has become part of most health technology assessment (HTA) bodies' preoccupations. The Quebec government HTA organization in Canada observed that some of its projects relied on innovative practices in knowledge production and dissemination. A research was commissioned in order to identify what characterized these practices and to establish whether they could be systematized.MethodsAn exploratory case study was conducted during summer and fall 2010 in the HTA agency in order to determine what made the specificity of its context, and to conceptualize an approach to knowledge production and dissemination that was adapted to the mandate and nature of this form of HTA organization. Six projects were selected. For each, the HTA report and complementary documents were analyzed, and semi-structured interviews were carried out. A narrative literature review of the most recent literature reviews of the principal knowledge into practice frameworks (2005-2010) and of articles describing such frameworks (2000-2010) was undertaken.Results and discussionOur observations highlighted an inherent difficulty as regards applying the dominant knowledge translation models to HTA and clinical guidance practices. For the latter, the whole process starts with an evaluation question asked in a problematic situation for which an actionable answer is expected. The objective is to produce the evidence necessary to respond to the decision-maker's request. The practices we have analyzed revealed an approach to knowledge production and dissemination, which was multidimensional, organic, multidirectional, dynamic, and dependent on interactions with stakeholders. Thus, HTA could be considered as a knowledge mobilization process per se.ConclusionsHTA's purpose is to solve a problem by mobilizing the types of evidence required and the concerned actors, in order to support political, organizational or clinical decision-making. HTA relies on the mediation between contextual, colloquial and scientific evidence, as well as on interactions with stakeholders for recommendation making. Defining HTA as a knowledge mobilization process might contribute to consider the different orders of knowledge, the social, political and ethical dimensions, and the interactions with stakeholders, among the essential components required to respond to the preoccupations, needs and contexts of all actors concerned with the evaluation question's issues.

Evidence Informed Decision Making: The Use of “Colloquial Evidence” at Nice

“…In this study, CE was defined as the “ evidence about resources, opinion, political judgment, values, culture, and the particular pragmatics of a situation ” that is used to complement the scientific evidence as originally defined by Lomas and colleagues (3). This definition includes information that comes informally from different stakeholders including practitioners and patients and is also consistent with its use in other such studies (15;25;26).…”

Mapping of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) teaching and training initiatives: Landscape for evidence-based policy decisions in India

“…[ 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ] Sensitizing policy makers would be another important step toward highlighting the importance of HTA as an autonomous domain. [ 14 18 44 ] As per the evidence from the available literature, teaching and training programmes architect the future research and policy formulation. [ 26 27 28 29 30 ] HTA implications would be better understood by the people at the decision making level in a series of health policies.…”

“…Literature highlights on synthesizing the existing evidence for supporting healthcare decisions among clinicians, decision makers, and community. [ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ] An initiative in health care decision-making such as evidence-based medicine (EBM) and comparative effectiveness research (CER) have emerged as a response from clinical/evidences. [ 20 21 22 ] However, the decision-making process in health care is a complex and dynamic process which involves the interplay of various factors.…”

A Avaliação das Tecnologias em Saúde: origem, desenvolvimento e desafios atuais. Panorama internacional e Brasil

“…Saúde Pública 2020; 36(9):e00006820 sistemas de saúde são também sempre políticas. Essas decisões não se sustentariam unicamente em bases científicas e técnicas e deveriam ser apresentadas como decisões que buscam equilíbrio entre interesses concorrentes, apoiadas não apenas no conhecimento científico estrito senso, mas também em outros tipos de conhecimento, como as dimensões éticas, políticas e culturais 4,5 .…”