2005
DOI: 10.1080/09654310500139277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge management in regional innovation networks: The case of Lahti, Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the process of restructuring existing knowledge that enables it to be exploited. Despite considerable criticism of the model, which argues that it is too individualistic and not empirically sound (see e.g., Gourlay, 2006;Harmaakorpi & Melkas, 2005), its usefulness is reflected in its application across a range of disciplines and contexts including accounting (Cai, 2014), cross-cultural studies (Easa & Fincham, 2012), librarianship (C. S. Lee & Kelkar, 2013), organizational learning (Hong, 2012), and engineering (Sarirete & Chikh, 2010). It has been chosen for this study as its structural focus fits with the KVC approach, while supporting the ideas of the need to move ideas from one place to another to create knowledge, which can then be captured (see also Cook & Brown, 1999).…”
Section: The Kvc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the process of restructuring existing knowledge that enables it to be exploited. Despite considerable criticism of the model, which argues that it is too individualistic and not empirically sound (see e.g., Gourlay, 2006;Harmaakorpi & Melkas, 2005), its usefulness is reflected in its application across a range of disciplines and contexts including accounting (Cai, 2014), cross-cultural studies (Easa & Fincham, 2012), librarianship (C. S. Lee & Kelkar, 2013), organizational learning (Hong, 2012), and engineering (Sarirete & Chikh, 2010). It has been chosen for this study as its structural focus fits with the KVC approach, while supporting the ideas of the need to move ideas from one place to another to create knowledge, which can then be captured (see also Cook & Brown, 1999).…”
Section: The Kvc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept has its roots in the innovation system approach, but also involves the recognition of the microeconomic and policy-related determinants of innovative capability that exist within industrial clusters (Furman et al 2002). Thus, the concept of regional innovation environment leans on several other theoretical frameworks besides the innovation systems literature and is constructed from a wider array of regional actors as well as other components such as cooperation, networking, local atmosphere, and interactive learning (Harmaakorpi & Melkas 2005;Tura & Harmaakorpi 2005).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we believe that knowledge management capabilities, including the ability to explicate tacit knowledge, collect and share explicit knowledge resources and help urban actors to increase their tacit knowledge (Harmaakorpi, 2006;Harmaakorpi & Melkas, 2005), are essential for accumulating. For knowledge to be shared, it must first be made conscious and articulated through an externalization (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).…”
Section: Individual Public Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%