Knowledge level model of a configurable learning system

Albert, Patrick

doi:10.1007/3-540-58487-0_20

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…P. Albert, as an invited speaker, presented a generic architecture called HAIKU to configure generate-and-test ML algorithms (Rouveirol & Albert, 1994;Nedellec & Rouveirol, 1994). The control level of HAIKU is composed of a set of three types of bias called language, search and validation biases, and a set of learning operators.…”

Section: Problem-solving View Of MLmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition

Nédellec

1995

The Knowledge Engineering Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition” may be a surprising title for an ECAI-94 workshop, since most machine learning (ML) systems are intended for knowledge acquisition (KA). So what seems problematic about integrating ML and KA? The answer lies in the difference between the approaches developed by what is referred to as ML and KA research. Apart from sonic major exceptions, such as learning apprentice tools (Mitchell et al., 1989), or libraries like the Machine Learning Toolbox (MLT Consortium, 1993), most ML algorithms have been described without any characterization in terms of real application needs, in terms of what they could be effectively useful for. Although ML methods have been applied to “real world” problems few general and reusable conclusions have been drawn from these knowledge acquisition experiments. As ML techniques become more and more sophisticated and able to produce various forms of knowledge, the number of possible applications grows. ML methods tend then to be more precisely specified in terms of the domain knowledge initially required, the control knowledge to be set and the nature of the system output (MLT Consortium, 1993; Kodratoff et al., 1994).

show abstract

Section: Problem-solving View Of MLmentioning

confidence: 99%