2023
DOI: 10.1108/vjikms-12-2021-0313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge leakage through social networks: a review of existing gaps, strategies for mitigating potential risk factors and future research direction

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to systematically review the literature on knowledge leakage through social networks in the past decade to find existing gaps, identify potential risk factors while, ultimately, proposing ways of mitigating these factors. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis as guide for searching relevant scholarly publications. Subject-specific and -related research papers were obtained from three databases, namely, Scopus,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, future studies should continue to analyze the presence of other types of opportunistic behavior, such as knowledge leakage (Timiyo and Foli, 2023). For instance, it would be interesting to determine whether the insights generated by BAC are falling into the wrong hands, assuming that employees could be deliberately or accidentally leaking them to external actors interested in exploiting such key information (Qiu and Haugland, 2019), which would have detrimental effects on OA.…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, future studies should continue to analyze the presence of other types of opportunistic behavior, such as knowledge leakage (Timiyo and Foli, 2023). For instance, it would be interesting to determine whether the insights generated by BAC are falling into the wrong hands, assuming that employees could be deliberately or accidentally leaking them to external actors interested in exploiting such key information (Qiu and Haugland, 2019), which would have detrimental effects on OA.…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%