Knowledge in process? Exploring barriers between epidemiological research and local health policy development

Abstract

BackgroundIn the Netherlands municipalities are legally required to draw up a Local Health Policy Memorandum every four years. This policy memorandum should be based on (local) epidemiological research as performed by the Regional Health Services. However, it is largely unknown if and in what way epidemiological research is used during local policy development. As part of a larger study on knowledge utilization at the local level in The Netherlands, an analytical framework on the use of epidemiological research in local health policy development in the Netherlands is presented here.MethodBased on a literature search and a short inventory on experiences from Regional Health Services, we made a description of existing research utilization models and concepts about research utilization. Subsequently we mapped different barriers in research transmission.ResultsThe interaction model is regarded as the main explanatory model. It acknowledges the interactive and incremental nature of policy development, which takes place in a context and includes diversity within the groups of researchers and policymakers. This fits well in the dynamic and complex setting of local Dutch health policy.For the conceptual framework we propose a network approach, in which we "extend" the interaction model. We not only focus on the one-to-one relation between an individual researcher and policymaker but include interactions between several actors participating in the research and policy process.In this model interaction between actors in the research and the policy network is expected to improve research utilization. Interaction can obstruct or promote four clusters of barriers between research and policy: expectations, transfer issues, acceptance, and interpretation. These elements of interactions and barriers provide an actual explanation of research utilization. Research utilization itself can be measured on the individual level of actors and on a policy process level.ConclusionThe developed framework has added value on existing models on research utilization because it emphasizes on the 'logic' of the context of the research and policy networks. The framework will contribute to a better understanding of the impact of epidemiological research in local health policy development, however further operationalisation of the concepts mentioned in the framework remains necessary.

Adolescentes y consumo nocivo de alcohol: Chile 2009: mirando a las políticas públicas

“…Pero las barreras con base en las expectativas, la transferencia, la aceptación y la interpretación de la información generada desde la epidemiología y que debe servir para la acción son aún mayores 21 . Ha sido el reconocimiento de la naturaleza y complejidad de los procesos políticos en salud pública 22 el que nos ha motivado a explorar el uso de herramientas que permitan ampliar el espacio de interacción entre quienes declaramos un objetivo común como es la mejoría de las condiciones sanitarias de la población.…”

Public health knowledge utilisation by policy actors: an evaluation study in Midden-Holland, the Netherlands

“…The theoretical basis for this evaluation study was derived from research literature in the field of knowledge utilisation; it is represented in the conceptual model shown in Figure 2 (de Goede et al, 2010). The interaction between researcher and user is a key element in this conceptual model because the interaction process is seen as an essential precondition for knowledge utilisation (Spaapen and Wamelink, 2000;Innvaer et al, 2002;Hanney et al, 2003).…”

Contributions of knowledge products to health policy: a case study on the Public Health Status and Forecasts Report 2010

“…Theories on the complex policy process can help scientists who want to contribute to policy-making to understand the role of knowledge in that process 5–8 . To address this complexity, interaction models for knowledge use have been developed that take into account the policy-makers’ needs and that focus on the interaction between researchers and policy-makers, as reflected in the model developed by De Goede, e.g 9 . The ‘constructivist’ perspective goes a step further by considering knowledge as a social construct produced in a co-creation process 10 ,.…”