2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Graph-Based Spatial-Aware User Community Preference Query Algorithm for LBSNs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because existing research methods have not completely solved the problem of variable clustered nearest neighbor query (F ANNR ) in a road network, Chen et al [12] proposed a kF ANNR query based on keyword aware variant on this basis, but this query does not fully consider the preference of each user. In order to solve the problem of user community spatial preference and improve its performance, Wang et al [13] proposed a spatially aware user community preference query algorithm based on a knowledge graph, which considers the user's location semantic information and POIs to effectively discover the user's community preference. In order to achieve this goal, the algorithm first used Tr-tree spatial index to improve the query efficiency and then introduced the community satisfaction degree model based on the knowledge graph to comprehensively evaluate whether POIs can better meet the preference of the user community.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because existing research methods have not completely solved the problem of variable clustered nearest neighbor query (F ANNR ) in a road network, Chen et al [12] proposed a kF ANNR query based on keyword aware variant on this basis, but this query does not fully consider the preference of each user. In order to solve the problem of user community spatial preference and improve its performance, Wang et al [13] proposed a spatially aware user community preference query algorithm based on a knowledge graph, which considers the user's location semantic information and POIs to effectively discover the user's community preference. In order to achieve this goal, the algorithm first used Tr-tree spatial index to improve the query efficiency and then introduced the community satisfaction degree model based on the knowledge graph to comprehensively evaluate whether POIs can better meet the preference of the user community.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the QI-SCSA algorithm [31] and the algorithm anytimeQE-approx algorithm [35] are slightly improved (the missing data is completed) and compared with the PCAR method in this paper in terms of data missing rate. After completing the data by PCAR algorithm, the PIPKQ algorithm in this paper can be compared with the BA algorithm [12], PQA algorithm [13] and DSAS algorithm [36] (extended DSAS algorithm, scored data points meeting different user requirements, and returned k Skyline result sets from high to low according to data point scores, and the extended algorithm was called EDS) in terms of k value, number of POIs, and the number of query objects. To ensure the validity of the experiment, we took an average of 30 queries for analysis.…”
Section: Experiments Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point of interest (POI) [8], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [21], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [9], [37] E-commerce [38], [39], [40], [34], [41], [21], [22], [24], [42], [43], [3] Travel and tourism [24], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [6], [49] Entertainment [48], [50], [31], [24] Others [51], [18], [8], [52], [53], [6], [54], [49]…”
Section: Application Domain Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [47] proposed the use of the historical information of each user in the group to automatically set the group preference and its weight in the social graph. Furthermore, several works suggested to focus future research on the development of new approaches for (i) assessing the relevance of the query results, for instance, by using realworld data collected from the Web [45]; and (ii) training knowledge graphs, for instance, by using deep learning technologies to intelligently perceive the user community preference information and choose the best POI to retrieve [61]. In addition, a look at new kinds of geosocial queries is also suggested by the surveyed works.…”
Section: Open Challenges Idmentioning
confidence: 99%