Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of the Older Adult Population

Abstract

Abstract-The incidence and prevalence of most cardiovascular disorders increase with age, and cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and major disability in adults ≥75 years of age; however, despite the large impact of cardiovascular disease on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality in older adults, patients aged ≥75 years have been markedly underrepresented in most major cardiovascular trials, and virtually all trials have excluded older patients with complex comorbidities, significant physical or cognitive disabilities, frailty, or residence in a nursing home or assisted living facility. As a result, current guidelines are unable to provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of older patients typical of those encountered in routine clinical practice. The objectives of this scientific statement are to summarize current guideline recommendations as they apply to older adults, identify critical gaps in knowledge that preclude informed evidence-based decision making, and recommend future research to close existing knowledge gaps. To achieve these objectives, we conducted a detailed review of current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guidelines to identify content and recommendations that explicitly targeted older patients. We found that there is a pervasive lack of evidence to guide clinical decision making in older patients with cardiovascular disease, as well as a paucity of data on the impact of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on key outcomes that are particularly important to older patients, such as quality of life, physical function, and maintenance of independence. Accordingly, there is a critical need for a multitude of large population-based studies and clinical trials that include a broad spectrum of older patients representative of those seen in clinical practice and that incorporate relevant outcomes important to older patients in the study design. The results ofCirculation is available at http://circ.ahajournals.org DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000380The American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the American Geriatrics Society make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American Heart Association (professional.heart.org) and the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org). A copy of the document is available at http://professional.heart.org/statements by using either "Search for Guidelines & Statements" or the "Browse by Topic" area. To purchase additional reprints, call 843-216-2533 or e-mail kelle.ramsay@wolterskluwer.com.Expert peer ...

Cardio-oncology in the older adult

“…As the incidence of cancer rises with increasing age, so does the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Those older than 65 years account for more than half of CVD hospitalizations and approximately 80% of deaths (5). Even more striking, those 75 years of age or older account for 50% of cardiovascular deaths despite accounting for only 6% of the population (5).…”

Delphi Analysis of Science Gaps in the 2015 American Heart Association Cardiac Arrest Guidelines

“…As part of this goal, we leveraged the knowledge of resuscitation experts to identify 10 high‐yield science gaps where researchers, stakeholders, and funding agencies may direct resources to improve survival from cardiac arrest. This approach has been used in other areas to improve outcomes by effecting research decisions to direct attention and funding at significant public health problems 23, 24. In this study, the expert panel generated a list of 10 prioritized knowledge gaps but was unable to reach consensus on the top 3 at our predetermined 75% level.…”

Seniors Welcome! Avoiding the Trap of Age Limits in Health Research

“…It is disappointing that despite the known association of advancing age with cardiovascular disease and poor clinical outcomes, little is understood about mechanisms underlying aging-associated functional decline and factors that contribute to impaired quality of life, disability and loss of independence. 3 The evidence base to optimally manage cardiovascular diseases in the older-elderly also is limited due to the exclusion from or scant representation in randomized clinical trials of subjects ≥ 75 years of age and those residing in nursing homes or assisted care facilities. [3][4][5][6] Even when the elderly have been included in trials, they were relatively healthy and had few comorbidities, meaning these subjects were not necessarily representative of the community.…”

“…Additionally, studies that improve understanding of mechanisms and define optimal management for improving survival, hospitalization, quality of life, functional capacity and cost-effectiveness in the growing number of elderly with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are needed. 3 In some ways, science is a victim of its own success. We remain grateful for the improvements in health care that have allowed more humans to live longer.…”