2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-017-5651-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge elicitation via sequential probabilistic inference for high-dimensional prediction

Abstract: Prediction in a small-sized sample with a large number of covariates, the "small n, large p" problem, is challenging. This setting is encountered in multiple applications, such as in precision medicine, where obtaining additional data can be extremely costly or even impossible, and extensive research effort has recently been dedicated to finding principled solutions for accurate prediction. However, a valuable source of additional information, domain experts, has not yet been efficiently exploited. We formulat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feedback improved the predictive performance in both systems (p-value= 3 × 10 −8 in baseline and p-value= 5 × 10 −9 in IE without user model, using paired-sample t-test). This shows, as analogously claimed in [3], that the participants, on average, have the necessary knowledge to improve the prediction. More prominently, the predictive performance further improved in the IE system after inferring the latent user knowledge using the user model (p-value= 7 × 10 −7 in No, I did not consider them much Yes, I considered some of them paired-sample t-test between directly using the feedbacks and after employing the user model).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The feedback improved the predictive performance in both systems (p-value= 3 × 10 −8 in baseline and p-value= 5 × 10 −9 in IE without user model, using paired-sample t-test). This shows, as analogously claimed in [3], that the participants, on average, have the necessary knowledge to improve the prediction. More prominently, the predictive performance further improved in the IE system after inferring the latent user knowledge using the user model (p-value= 7 × 10 −7 in No, I did not consider them much Yes, I considered some of them paired-sample t-test between directly using the feedbacks and after employing the user model).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This creates a dependency between the feedback and training data that needs to be accounted for in the model to avoid double use of data and overfitting. the user (e.g., active learning) [3,18,19]. Some methods use validation datasets in addition to the training set to evaluate the performance.…”
Section: Updated Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the extracted knowledge from the interaction, the parameters of the underlying model are tuned to reflect the user's knowledge. In recent work, Daee et al [5] proposed a method of eliciting user's knowledge on single features to improve the predictions in a sparse linear regression problem. The user's knowledge assumed to be about feature relevance and/or feature weight values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%