2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge development and sharing in multinational corporations: The case of a centre of excellence and a transnational team

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while not all subsidiaries are equally predisposed to launching or leveraging knowledge among other units of the MNC (Gold, Malhotra, & Segars, 2001), MNC headquarters can strengthen its control by creating an organizational setting (i.e. reshaping the internal MNC network) that is most conducive to knowledge sharing (Björkman, Barner-Rasmussen, & Li, 2004;Ciabuschi, Martin Martin, & Stahl, 2010;Foss & Pedersen, 2004), In this sense, the assignment of R&D roles, such as the establishment of a centre of excellence, is a deliberate mechanism available to headquarters to enhance knowledge development and sharing (Adenfelt & Lagerström, 2006). Consequently, as previous studies highlight, the configuration of the internal network is an important issue in the development of subsidiary R&D roles within an MNC.…”
Section: Internal Mnc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while not all subsidiaries are equally predisposed to launching or leveraging knowledge among other units of the MNC (Gold, Malhotra, & Segars, 2001), MNC headquarters can strengthen its control by creating an organizational setting (i.e. reshaping the internal MNC network) that is most conducive to knowledge sharing (Björkman, Barner-Rasmussen, & Li, 2004;Ciabuschi, Martin Martin, & Stahl, 2010;Foss & Pedersen, 2004), In this sense, the assignment of R&D roles, such as the establishment of a centre of excellence, is a deliberate mechanism available to headquarters to enhance knowledge development and sharing (Adenfelt & Lagerström, 2006). Consequently, as previous studies highlight, the configuration of the internal network is an important issue in the development of subsidiary R&D roles within an MNC.…”
Section: Internal Mnc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, as previous studies highlight, the configuration of the internal network is an important issue in the development of subsidiary R&D roles within an MNC. The reason for this is that the relatively autonomous subsidiaries develop knowledge abroad and the internal network linkages are the channel by which such knowledge is made available to the rest of the MNC (Adenfelt & Lagerström, 2006). This in turn influences the internal strategic context for decision making in an 6 MNC (Garcia-Pont et al, 2009) and, thus, affects decisions regarding which subsidiaries to invest in and which to allocate mandates to (Bouquet & Birkinshaw, 2008).…”
Section: Internal Mnc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering employment practices, one aspect of this is the extent to which the HR function has international channels through which diffusion might occur. One distinction that is linked to different types of international HR channels is between 'codifiable' and 'tacit' knowledge (Adenfelt and Lagerstrom 2006, Kogut and Zander 2003, Minbaeva 2007. There is some evidence that codifiable knowledge concerning HR practices can effectively be transferred through such mechanisms as international committees, information systems, databases and management audits (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, global knowledge integration needs the presence of a well-definite organizational structure (Lipparini & Fratocchi, 1999). In this regard, Adenfelt and Lagerstrom (2006a) identified two possible organizational structures that support cross-border knowledge integration: multi-domestic and independent. The former consists in empowering several subsidiaries, from different locations, to work on the same assignment.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can define more independently their future technological orientations, in an emergent way, without being bound to other plants. The knowledge outcome, locally and independently developed in each site, is shared afterward with the rest of the firm (Adenfelt & Lagerstrom, 2006a).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%