2020
DOI: 10.14689/jomes.2020.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-Constitutive Interests and Social Paradigms in Guiding Mixed Methods Research (MMR)

Abstract: The four paradigms of 'radical structuralist', 'funcionalist', 'interpretive' and 'radical humanist' (Burrel &Morgan, 1979) andHabermas's (1987) theory of knowledge-constitutive interests have solid philosophical positions to guide the designs of MMR in social sciences. Research nature and social phenomena can be mainly analyzed based on objective and subjective perspectives. After discussing the application of four paradigms and Habermas's theory of knowledge-constitutive interests of technical, hermeneutic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is lensed with Transformative Paradigm (TP) to ensure that the current situation of rurally located universities is transformed and decolonised using ABA. This paradigm is appropriate because its priority is based on postmodernism, emancipation and ideological in changing the existing status quo for better (Gunbayi, 2020). In similar parlance, TP enables equal efforts among the people (university stakeholders) to challenge unequal power differential and reconstruct themselves within their sovereignty (Hughes, 2020).…”
Section: Research Paradigm and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is lensed with Transformative Paradigm (TP) to ensure that the current situation of rurally located universities is transformed and decolonised using ABA. This paradigm is appropriate because its priority is based on postmodernism, emancipation and ideological in changing the existing status quo for better (Gunbayi, 2020). In similar parlance, TP enables equal efforts among the people (university stakeholders) to challenge unequal power differential and reconstruct themselves within their sovereignty (Hughes, 2020).…”
Section: Research Paradigm and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretive paradigm is an approach that tries to understand and explain the inner‐subjective world directly from the subjective point of view of individuals. It is anti‐positivist, voluntary and ideographic (Gunbayi, 2020). A research paradigm is based on ontology, epistemology and methodology (Ling & Ling, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradigm is deemed appropriate to lens the project because its assumptions are to emancipate the people through the ideological process and change the people's status quo from marginalisation to the world of being (Gunbayi, 2020). Hughes (2020) also views the transformative paradigm from the dimension of power by saying that unequal power differential among people could be challenged by working together as a team to transform their lives.…”
Section: Methodology Paradigmatic Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%