“…Frequent happening of natural and man-made disaster catastrophic events has brought about huge impact on communities, families and many other societal units, not only suffering from illness or loss of lives but also from negative effects on economic and social conditions in the local area [6]. Lessons from these disasters have compelled governments to evaluate and include emergency response solutions regarding identifiable risks to guarantee sustainable community development.…”
“…to unleash business opportunities in local communities has concurrently also brought about potential risks on environment, human health and safety, and sustainability (EHS/S) [47], which urges local governments to set up decision making procedures for emergency response solutions evalution (ERSE). Figure 1 depicts the basic motivation that ERSE has been recognized as a vital routine activity to serve emergency management in sustainable community planning [6,47,48]. …”
“…to unleash business opportunities in local communities has concurrently also brought about potential risks on environment, human health and safety, and sustainability (EHS/S) [47], which urges local governments to set up decision making procedures for emergency response solutions evalution (ERSE). Figure 1 depicts the basic motivation that ERSE has been recognized as a vital routine activity to serve emergency management in sustainable community planning [6,47,48]. Generally speaking, emergency response solution is a group of procedures to be implemented in case of a catastrophic event situation involving risk analysis, communication, intervention actions, operational support, logistic support, and whatever is necessary to reduce accident impacts [6][7][8]14,49].…”
“…Correspondingly, when community development department (CDD) evaluates alternative emergency response solutions to potential risks of emergency scenarios, decision criteria should be derived from these three stages. Generally speaking, emergency response solution is a group of procedures to be implemented in case of a catastrophic event situation involving risk analysis, communication, intervention actions, operational support, logistic support, and whatever is necessary to reduce accident impacts [6][7][8]14,49]. Following suggestions of practices [50] and the lifecycle theory of emergency management [48,51], effective emergency response solutions should be prepared to cover three stages: pre-event, during-event and after-event.…”
“…The main purpose of these DSS-based approaches is to help emergency managers select among alternative response actions in complex and uncertain situations [6]. Although the emergency management unit in a community development department can maintain a balanced managerial status characterized by a set of qualified response solutions to specific emergency situations so that decision makers can quickly and effectively approve the suggested course of actions in front of an event [6], economic development programs in communities often break that balance which requires emergency response solutions [2,7,8] in community planning to answer risks associated with newly introduced potential threats or disasters. Taking the YiWu International Trading Community in China for example, obviously, trading communication and manufacturing collaboration with developing or undeveloped countries have substantially contributed to local fast economic growth.…”
Emergency management is vital in implementing sustainable community development, for which community planning must include emergency response solutions to potential natural and manmade hazards. To help maintain such solution repository, we investigate effective fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making (FMCGDM) approaches for the complex problems of evaluating alternative emergency response solutions, where weights for decision makers and criteria are unknown due to problem complexity. We employ interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy (IVDHF) set to address decision hesitancy more effectively. Based on IVDHF assessments, we develop a deviation maximizing model to compute criteria weights and another compatibility maximizing model to calculate weights for decision makers. Then, two ideal-solution-based FMCGDM approaches are proposed: (i) by introducing a synthesized IVDHF group decision matrix into TOPSIS, we develop an IVDHF-TOPSIS approach for fuzzy group settings; (ii) when emphasizing both maximum group utility and minimum individual regret, we extend VIKOR to develop an IVDHF-VIKOR approach, where the derived decision makers' weights are utilized to obtain group decision matrix and the determined criteria weights are integrated to reflect the relative importance of distances from the compromised ideal solution. Compared with aggregation-operators-based approach, IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR can alleviate information loss and computational complexity. Numerical examples have validated the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
“…Frequent happening of natural and man-made disaster catastrophic events has brought about huge impact on communities, families and many other societal units, not only suffering from illness or loss of lives but also from negative effects on economic and social conditions in the local area [6]. Lessons from these disasters have compelled governments to evaluate and include emergency response solutions regarding identifiable risks to guarantee sustainable community development.…”
“…to unleash business opportunities in local communities has concurrently also brought about potential risks on environment, human health and safety, and sustainability (EHS/S) [47], which urges local governments to set up decision making procedures for emergency response solutions evalution (ERSE). Figure 1 depicts the basic motivation that ERSE has been recognized as a vital routine activity to serve emergency management in sustainable community planning [6,47,48]. …”
“…to unleash business opportunities in local communities has concurrently also brought about potential risks on environment, human health and safety, and sustainability (EHS/S) [47], which urges local governments to set up decision making procedures for emergency response solutions evalution (ERSE). Figure 1 depicts the basic motivation that ERSE has been recognized as a vital routine activity to serve emergency management in sustainable community planning [6,47,48]. Generally speaking, emergency response solution is a group of procedures to be implemented in case of a catastrophic event situation involving risk analysis, communication, intervention actions, operational support, logistic support, and whatever is necessary to reduce accident impacts [6][7][8]14,49].…”
“…Correspondingly, when community development department (CDD) evaluates alternative emergency response solutions to potential risks of emergency scenarios, decision criteria should be derived from these three stages. Generally speaking, emergency response solution is a group of procedures to be implemented in case of a catastrophic event situation involving risk analysis, communication, intervention actions, operational support, logistic support, and whatever is necessary to reduce accident impacts [6][7][8]14,49]. Following suggestions of practices [50] and the lifecycle theory of emergency management [48,51], effective emergency response solutions should be prepared to cover three stages: pre-event, during-event and after-event.…”
“…The main purpose of these DSS-based approaches is to help emergency managers select among alternative response actions in complex and uncertain situations [6]. Although the emergency management unit in a community development department can maintain a balanced managerial status characterized by a set of qualified response solutions to specific emergency situations so that decision makers can quickly and effectively approve the suggested course of actions in front of an event [6], economic development programs in communities often break that balance which requires emergency response solutions [2,7,8] in community planning to answer risks associated with newly introduced potential threats or disasters. Taking the YiWu International Trading Community in China for example, obviously, trading communication and manufacturing collaboration with developing or undeveloped countries have substantially contributed to local fast economic growth.…”
Emergency management is vital in implementing sustainable community development, for which community planning must include emergency response solutions to potential natural and manmade hazards. To help maintain such solution repository, we investigate effective fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making (FMCGDM) approaches for the complex problems of evaluating alternative emergency response solutions, where weights for decision makers and criteria are unknown due to problem complexity. We employ interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy (IVDHF) set to address decision hesitancy more effectively. Based on IVDHF assessments, we develop a deviation maximizing model to compute criteria weights and another compatibility maximizing model to calculate weights for decision makers. Then, two ideal-solution-based FMCGDM approaches are proposed: (i) by introducing a synthesized IVDHF group decision matrix into TOPSIS, we develop an IVDHF-TOPSIS approach for fuzzy group settings; (ii) when emphasizing both maximum group utility and minimum individual regret, we extend VIKOR to develop an IVDHF-VIKOR approach, where the derived decision makers' weights are utilized to obtain group decision matrix and the determined criteria weights are integrated to reflect the relative importance of distances from the compromised ideal solution. Compared with aggregation-operators-based approach, IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR can alleviate information loss and computational complexity. Numerical examples have validated the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.