2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
685
1
44

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,080 publications
(740 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
685
1
44
Order By: Relevance
“…Some clusters prosper, while others do not -the reasons for that difference in progress are still unclear [11, p. 24]. Studies on clusters usually draw on the common rationale that territorial agglomeration provides the best context for an innovation-based globalizing economy due to localized learning processes and "sticky" knowledge grounded in social interaction [3]. It is a general lesson from research on R&D networks that open and interconnected networks with links to different knowledge categories foster knowledge diffusion, exploit synergies, and bridge social closure [46].…”
Section: Public Funding Of Localised Randd Network and Regional Knowlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some clusters prosper, while others do not -the reasons for that difference in progress are still unclear [11, p. 24]. Studies on clusters usually draw on the common rationale that territorial agglomeration provides the best context for an innovation-based globalizing economy due to localized learning processes and "sticky" knowledge grounded in social interaction [3]. It is a general lesson from research on R&D networks that open and interconnected networks with links to different knowledge categories foster knowledge diffusion, exploit synergies, and bridge social closure [46].…”
Section: Public Funding Of Localised Randd Network and Regional Knowlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All in all, EUR 675 million of public funds are devoted to the promotion of competence centres in the framework of the COMET 2 programme [44, pp. [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ecosystem of innovations, there has been a focus upon establishing highly communicative and creative cooperation networks of local actors. We define innovation as an interactive learning process as it is understood in the context of the learning economy and it is socially and territorially embedded and culturally and institutionally contextualised (Asheim and Coenen, 2005). An innovation ecosystem in turn is formed around various actors, material resources and human capital in order to enable technology or service development, and innovation; these ecosystems of course include typically HEIs and their sub-units (Adner, 2006;Carayannis and Campbell, 2009;Jackson, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An innovation ecosystem in turn is formed around various actors, material resources and human capital in order to enable technology or service development, and innovation; these ecosystems of course include typically HEIs and their sub-units (Adner, 2006;Carayannis and Campbell, 2009;Jackson, 2011). Characteristic of an ecosystemic approach is that innovations are carried out through learning exchange and collaboration between those actors (see Jackson, 2011;Mars et al, 2012;Asheim and Coenen, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovations as an output of learning and knowledge creation processes are regarded as a fundamental element of firms' competitiveness strategies in the current era of globalisation (e.g. Asheim and Coenen, 2005;Dohse, 2007;Tödtling and Trippl, 2005;Waxell and Malmberg, 2007). There are several traditional factors which influence learning and knowledge creation, including investments in basic R&D inputs and R&D institutional framework (Crescenzi, Rodríguez-Pose and Storper, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%