2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.07.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge augmented transformer for adversarial multidomain multiclassification multimodal fake news detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several survey and review papers that contain detection challenges and potential open issues have been published recently, including but not limited to [34][35][36][37][40][41][42][43]. Many issues have been researched related to feature extraction [6][7][8][9][10], representation [8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17], classification [6,12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and model design [10,16,21,22,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Various solutions have been investigated using statical, traditional machine and deep learning and natural languageprocessing techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several survey and review papers that contain detection challenges and potential open issues have been published recently, including but not limited to [34][35][36][37][40][41][42][43]. Many issues have been researched related to feature extraction [6][7][8][9][10], representation [8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17], classification [6,12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and model design [10,16,21,22,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Various solutions have been investigated using statical, traditional machine and deep learning and natural languageprocessing techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been suggested to identify fake news. Numerous issues have been studied related to feature extraction [6][7][8][9][10], representation [8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17], classification [6,12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and model design [10,16,21,22,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Based on the representative features that are employed, fake news detection techniques can be can be categorized into four groups: content-, knowledge-, users-, and propagation-based features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Della Vedova et al ( 2018) proposed a method that has been implemented in a chatbot Facebook Messenger and validated with a realistic application that has an accuracy of 81.7 percent in detecting fake news. Similarly, A temporal evolving graph neural network for false news detection has been suggested by Song et al (2021a;2021b), and it has been demonstrated that the proposed model outperforms existing fake news detection approaches. A study by Saadany et al (2020) was published in which the authors recommended utilising machine learning models to classify the linguistic aspects of Arabic Satirical Fake News in order to determine whether or not the Arabic news is true.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fake profile people purposely design content to gather attention of other users. Due to the social network's qualities of quick distribution and low cost, a significant amount of news content is disseminated there quickly [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%