Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Puerto Rico

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the psychosocial factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among Puerto Rican men and women. We conducted seven focus groups in metropolitan and rural areas of Puerto Rico (PR) with men and women (using gender specific groups) aged 50 to 80 years (n = 51) who were non-adherent to CRC guidelines. The focus group guide included questions related to colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. We analyzed data using a modified grounded theory approach to identify emergent themes. Focus groups revealed seven major themes that represented barriers to CRCS: (1) lack of CRC knowledge, (2) lack of knowledge about colorectal cancer screening tests as well as the required preparation, (3) embarrassment, (4) low perceived benefit of CRCS and sense of fatalism, (5) transportation (mostly among participants in rural areas), (6) lack of time, and (7) financial burden. All participants understood the benefits of CRCS once the procedure was explained. Additionally, participants reported a lack of provider recommendation for CRCS. In this group of Puerto Rican participants who were non-adherent to CRCS, there were misconceptions about CRC, screening tests available, and preparation and testing procedures. Participants’ low levels of knowledge and negative attitudes concerning CRCS and low reported provider recommendation were important deterrents to screening. These findings suggest the need for educational efforts to increase knowledge and attitudes about CRCS and improved patient-provider communication to reduce missed opportunities to recommend.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Colorectal Cancer's Prevention and Early Detection Among Older Adults in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…This could be due to limited outreach by healthcare providers or cultural barriers that prevent the effective dissemination of information. The contrast with studies reporting low attitudes, such as the one by Colón-López et al [ 37 ], may be attributed to methodological differences, such as sample size and composition. For instance, including older patients who have not previously been screened could skew results toward more negative attitudes.…”

Social determinants and participation in fecal occult blood test based colorectal cancer screening: A qualitative systematic review and meta‐synthesis

“…A total of 48 papers were included in this review of the literature. A flow chart of the study selection process is reported in Figure 1 11–58 …”

“…Further economic barriers to FOBT based screening included the need for financial support to complete the screening process and taking unpaid time off work 12,13,20–22,27,29–31,52 …”

“…12,13,[20][21][22]27,[29][30][31]52 In the case of multiple sub populations represented in one study, coding was applied to the priority population with the greatest representation.…”

Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Utilization after Hurricane María and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Puerto Rico

“…These observed disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the context of PR may be attributed to individual and system-level barriers. Prior studies conducted in PR have highlighted individual barriers to colorectal cancer screening, such as embarrassment, diminished perceived benefits, prevailing fatalism, transportation difficulties (especially in rural areas), limited time, and economic burdens [21]. These individual barriers might have been exacerbated during Hurricanes Irma and Maria, the seismic activity of 2020, and the COVID-19 pandemic, which might reflect these delays in colorectal cancer screening catching up to the 2016 baseline screening rates.…”